Nanoknee, is it better or merely hype?
Unfortunately, I have been diagnosed with arthritus in my left knee and told that it will eventually need a TKR. I have a friend who has had both knees replaced and heard horror stories about how painful it is. Searching the web I found a site (nanoknee.com) that claims that there knee replacement method is faster, better and less painful. Is this true? It seems that if it were better it would be used more often than titanium replacements. Supposedly it has been used for 10 years so there must be patients who have undergone it. Any advice would be helpful.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Joint Replacements Support Group.
Connect

@steveinarizona You're exactly right ... great hands and great mind. A surgeon needs to be precise and not all are. In January 2023, I had 2 meniscus tears repaired on my right knee. Almost a year after my ski accident. I struggled to walk after and this surgeon told me it was due to all the scar tissue that had formed. He said he could go in and remove it, but it would just form back. I was walking on 2 crutches at that time, very slowly. I looked at him and holding back tears asked him, "So, this is going to be the rest of my life?" He said, "I don't know what to tell you." Then I was scheduled to go to Lithuania for a Patella Femoral Replacement. A portion of the cost would have been covered by Alberta's healthcare system IF I could get a letter from a surgeon stating there was no one who could perform that surgery. I went to the surgeon who did surgery on my meniscus for this letter. He laughed at me and said he couldn't write that letter, because he can do that surgery, but he wouldn't do it on me, because I would be worse off. What went through my mind, but I bit my tongue, 'in other words, you say you can do the surgery, but you don't do it, because you don't do it well, so technically, you don't perform that particular surgery.' Another orthopaedic surgeon explained the process and you must be exact when making the angular cuts to the femur. There is no room for any error. Good hands are needed and the surgeon's attitude to be the best at their practice. Dr. Chow has both attributes.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions@sailnsun, interesting story, thanks for sharing!
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@steveinarizona
I have been following your commentary on your tkr experience and Dr. Chow. It has been very illuminating and I am in the process of scheduling a consult with Dr. Chow. One question I have for you is: is your new knee cemented, cementless, or hybrid, and if hybrid, which bone connection is cemented? My research so far makes me biased toward cementless--especially on the femur side, and I'm not sure if Dr. Chow does full cementless? Have you developed an opinion on the cemented vs cementless and if so, on what basis? For reference, I'm a 67 year old male, active and serious runner until about two months ago when my right knee started giving me serious problems. Based on my research so far and in a perfect world, I'd get a new cement free knee preserving both ligaments in the next two months and be back to running within 6 months of that. My biggest concern is choosing the wrong replacement system and ending up with a revision. I would welcome your thoughts.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionInteresting. Four years ago when Dr. Chow replaced my left hip it was cementless. That was why he had a five week couch potato requirement ("The only thing I can't do is make bones grow.").
Six months ago he replaced my right knee. According to the post surgery report, he used a third generation cement technique. I don't know whether he would do a cementless knee replacement but you could certainly ask him. I have not focused on the cementless vs cemented issue. I do suspect that if it is press fit, there will be a longer passive waiting period.
Dr, Chow is one of the very, very few who do and have done many BCRs. A BCR cannot be done if the ligaments are not strong. Dr. Chow was pretty sure from the MRI that my ligaments were strong enough but he did confirm that once he opened me up he found an intact and functional ACL.
At my six month checkup I asked him if I could run. He said if I wanted to.
If you do go cementless, I would suggest being very careful early on not to run before the surgeon confirms that your bones have properly formed around the implant.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@steveinarizona
Thanks for the response. I have done some additional reading just this moring on cemented vs cementless tkr. One study I read discussed the challenge of fitment on the femur due to the need for 5 perfect cuts to get a perfect fit of the prosthetic. This apparently makes it more challenging to get the contact required for organic bone bonding to the new joint. Makes me think maybe cemented is lower risk for the femur. I'll be interested to hear what Dr. Chow has to say.
I kind of think my ligaments are likely in good shape, but time will tell. It Dr. Chow's experience with BCR that draws me to him.
@rloeaz
I have been conducting an internal dialogue trying to figure out why I had such great recoveries and other recipients whose surgeons used similar methods did not. I think it comes down to great experience, great hands and a great mind (not mine of course; the surgeon's). Doing the cuts in a way that maximizes outcomes but minimizes painful recoveries is most likely the answer.
This is also where the BCR experience is so important. The fittings are different and require very specific cuts.
BTW...there is a post here (or in Reddit, I can't remember which) where the poster said that Smith & Nephew had taken the BCR implant off its website and according to the poster's ortho it was because no one was using it. I asked Dr. Chow about this and he said that it was pretty rare in the USA but much more common in Japan (e.g.) but Smith & Nephew is continuing to support Dr. Chow with the BCR implant.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions