MRI fusion biopsy or nah?

Hi - I posted earlier about a spike in my PSA over one month from 4.7 to 10.7. I had an MRI done and they noted a PI RADS 3 lesion without noted bone or lymph node pathology. The local urology group wants to biopsy it - and that’s fine - but doesn’t have MRI fusion technology. The clinician who is an experienced guy said there’s a paper out there that says that the incremental benefit of the fusion biopsy vs the traditional ultrasound transrectal biopsy done by an experienced practitioner is very marginal. Of course this is a little self serving. I can likely drive a few hours and have state of the art at a UC urology center. Is it worth the drive or is he generally correct?