Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Pleomorphic Level 3 (Oncotype Score 34)

Posted by ilcpfighter @ilcpfightee, Sep 8, 2022

I was diagnosed with ILC Pleomorphic Type Level 3. I am waiting for my Oncotype and was wondering if anyone here had a similar diagnosis and what your Oncotype Score was? Mine was ER+ PR- HER2 -. Waiting is so hard!

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Breast Cancer Support Group.

@delormv

@windyshores - do you know the name of the oncologist who specializes in lobular at Dana Farber? I have an appointment there with Dr. Garber on November 4th for atypical lobular hyperplasia and hoping she specializes in this area.
Thank you!
@delormv

Jump to this post

@delormv the doc's name is Otto Metzger

REPLY
@sybille

Nope,you read that right-11 by 15cm.I only noticed it when it started to bulge out,it had been invisible on all three mammograms I had prior to discovering it.

Jump to this post

@sybille: Wow. I simply can’t imagine a tumor that large slipping under the radar, so to speak. And for the mammograms to not pick up on that. I feel embarrassed that I questioned the cm vs mm - the latter is almost always applicable to breast cancer…..

REPLY
@ilcpfightee

I have a second opinion scheduled at MSKCC the day after they want to put the port in. I want to put that all off for one week, but that makes me nervous. I am guessing one week, in the grand scheme of things would be okay. I would be 9 weeks post-op when I start instead of 8.

Thank you for the article, I will read that for sure! Oncotype I also read isn't a good predictor with lobular, so many conflicting studies make it hard, or maybe I am just looking for a way out of chemo, lol.

Is it true that lobular can spread without being in nodes? My problem is only one node was taken as that is the only one that took dye, so not real good stats with that being negative either.

Sigh......

Jump to this post

I would definitely check the tailorX trial to make sure your type of cancer was part of the research because this study is used to support the Oncotype results. You could also try another genomic test like Mammaprint and others just to get another result to see if that test would indicate chemo or not. I did that and they differed. I had Stage 1 grade 1 IDC and one test showed a high risk of recurrence and the other test showed low risk of recurrence. So I am sure you will get multiple opinions which should help bring some clarity.

REPLY
@ellerbracke

@sybille: May I suggest the tumor was likely 11x15 mm, not centimeters? It’s easy to get it wrong if you haven’t grown up with the metric system. 11 cm is over 4”, which seems unlikely. Great news that you have been cancer free since you experienced the diagnosis, and treatment, 10 years ago!

Jump to this post

Nope,you read that right-11 by 15cm.I only noticed it when it started to bulge out,it had been invisible on all three mammograms I had prior to discovering it.

REPLY
@ilcpfightee

I got my Oncotype today and the number came in at 34. They recommended chemo but I have read studies that chemo doesn't really work on Invasive Lobular Carcinoma. Has anyone else had Invasive Lobular with such a high Oncotype? If so, what did you do?

Jump to this post

I don’t know about spreading without nodes. I am glad you are getting a second opinion. I can understand wanting to avoid chemo.😂 I would ask all these questions of the second opinion doctor or your regular doctor. Make sure you feel well informed about your treatment and expected outcomes.

REPLY
@auntieoakley

Here is some information, just a bit, but it might be helpful. If only to add more context to conversations.
This is from the NIH
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35137951/
It shows there is benefit in some cases of chemo with lobular cancer. That high oncotype number is the difference in this context. I hope you are able to have a second opinion and you have the right to put off chemo an extra week to get it and feel comfortable with your plan, but please don’t wait too long.
Are you currently scheduled for that second opinion?

Jump to this post

I have a second opinion scheduled at MSKCC the day after they want to put the port in. I want to put that all off for one week, but that makes me nervous. I am guessing one week, in the grand scheme of things would be okay. I would be 9 weeks post-op when I start instead of 8.

Thank you for the article, I will read that for sure! Oncotype I also read isn't a good predictor with lobular, so many conflicting studies make it hard, or maybe I am just looking for a way out of chemo, lol.

Is it true that lobular can spread without being in nodes? My problem is only one node was taken as that is the only one that took dye, so not real good stats with that being negative either.

Sigh......

REPLY
@sybille

I was diagnosed with invasive,lobular carcinoma ,grade 2,stage 3, 10years ago.After a double mastectomy,I had a break for three weeks,after which I was on chemo sessions,once every three weeks,for four months,followed by radiotherapy with 15 sessions.Without chemo my chance of recurrence was 75-I have never heard of chemotherapy not working for lobular cancer.My tumor was 11cm across,15 cm long,nothing looked very promising.I have not had a recurrence since.
Chemo saved my life!

Jump to this post

@sybille: May I suggest the tumor was likely 11x15 mm, not centimeters? It’s easy to get it wrong if you haven’t grown up with the metric system. 11 cm is over 4”, which seems unlikely. Great news that you have been cancer free since you experienced the diagnosis, and treatment, 10 years ago!

REPLY
@ilcpfightee

Thank you so much. They say they like to start treatments within 6-8 weeks post-op, and I can't get a second opinion that fast, they are booking out quite a few weeks. I am not sure how mission-critical that time frame is or if I have time to bump this off another week to allow for a consult. It is so hard to know what to do when research shows Chemo generally doesn't work on lobular, but the standard of care says to do it because it is based on ductal. I am at a loss for sure. I asked if chemo doesn't work if cancer moves, how does chemo work now, and got a skirted response that didn't really answer the question. I am so lost.....

Jump to this post

Here is some information, just a bit, but it might be helpful. If only to add more context to conversations.
This is from the NIH
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35137951/
It shows there is benefit in some cases of chemo with lobular cancer. That high oncotype number is the difference in this context. I hope you are able to have a second opinion and you have the right to put off chemo an extra week to get it and feel comfortable with your plan, but please don’t wait too long.
Are you currently scheduled for that second opinion?

REPLY
@windyshores

Find an oncologist who specializes in lobular. There is one at Dana Farber. Also there are advocacy and research groups for lobular that are accessible online.

Jump to this post

@windyshores - do you know the name of the oncologist who specializes in lobular at Dana Farber? I have an appointment there with Dr. Garber on November 4th for atypical lobular hyperplasia and hoping she specializes in this area.
Thank you!
@delormv

REPLY
@ilcpfightee

I got my Oncotype today and the number came in at 34. They recommended chemo but I have read studies that chemo doesn't really work on Invasive Lobular Carcinoma. Has anyone else had Invasive Lobular with such a high Oncotype? If so, what did you do?

Jump to this post

I was diagnosed with invasive,lobular carcinoma ,grade 2,stage 3, 10years ago.After a double mastectomy,I had a break for three weeks,after which I was on chemo sessions,once every three weeks,for four months,followed by radiotherapy with 15 sessions.Without chemo my chance of recurrence was 75-I have never heard of chemotherapy not working for lobular cancer.My tumor was 11cm across,15 cm long,nothing looked very promising.I have not had a recurrence since.
Chemo saved my life!

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.