I need advice to help make a decision.......
Just to set the background: RARP on September 16. Cancer was intraductal and they found at least 1 lymph node with PC in it. My 6 week PSA was undetectable.
Went to the radiation oncologist this morning. He gave me the choice to start ADT/Radiation (2 years ADT, 7 1/2 weeks of M-F radiation treatments) in January or wait until my PSA starts to go up. His data shows that either option is acceptable with outcomes the same. He also said there is a very slight chance I am cancer-free, but he really is not convinced and is leaning heavily toward PC lurking in me somewhere. He said it is 6 to one, half-dozen to the other.
My thoughts:
1. Both the surgeon and the oncologist are pretty sure that I am NOT cancer-free but right now the PSA is good. The oncologist said that could change with my 12-week blood test.
2. I am leaning heavily toward starting in January. Why wait for the PSA to go up? That means we are allowing the cancer to get large enough to impact PSA levels. To me, that is not acceptable. I don't want the cancer to get a foothold or grow at all.
3. I am a proactive person, not a reactive person. Having the ADT/Radiation therapy sooner rather than later is proactive, IMHO.
4. I am 71 now. As many of us here know, getting older takes its toll on our bodies. I am in good shape, very active, and not overweight. Today, I just cut down three trees, so I'm doing okay. Why would I wait a few years to start when my body is weaker due to the natural impact of aging? I know I can handle it now, but in five years, who knows?
5. He talked about the side effects: fatigue, loss of muscle mass, hot flashes. He said the radiation can also impact bowel movements and urinary frequency. Again, these are also, unfortunately, symptoms of the natural aging process (maybe not the hot flashes).
6. Is the ADT/Radiation regimen that bad that I should avoid it as long as I can?
Yes, I am leaning toward the "do it now" choice, but I want to make an informed decision. I have until mid-December to make the call.
So, if it were YOU, what direction might you take?
Thank you all!!! 🙂
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
I hope this isn't a really bad translation: Gracias por esto. Mi principal preocupación es que, dado que el primer caso de cáncer apareció tan rápido y avanzó rápidamente, experimentaría el mismo resultado al esperar nuevamente. Mi conciencia me dice que empiece más pronto que tarde.
Las tres opciones tienen ventajas y desventagas.
Observación
pro - riesgo reducido de muerte por efectos secondarios (por ex. infarto de miocardio, diabetes)
con - riesgo elevado de propagación del cancér
Prostatectomia
pro - elimina todo el cancér dentro de la próstata
con - no trata cualquier cáncer que existe fuera de la próstata; efectos secondarios posibles, como la incontinencia
Radioterapia
pro - también puede tratar el cáncer que se ha propagado un poco fuera de la próstata; riesgo reducido de incontinencia
con - pequeña posibilidad de no eliminar todo el cáncer dentro de la próstata; efectos secondarios posibles, como la cistitis o proctitis
Sólo su oncólogo puede recomendar uno sobre el otro pro su caso específico, y la decisión difícil la tiene Usted.