How low vitamin D causes a high PSA

Posted by Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc, Apr 13 11:19am

I tell everyone to sign up with ancan.org for their advanced prostate cancer meetings. You don’t even need to go to a meeting, but you get a weekly newsletter that has a tremendous amount of information.. I’ve already posted about the Prostox meeting that was in this week’s newsletter and here is some information about vitamin D and its effect on PSA.

When alert COO Bill Franklin was told by a Veteran he was advising that the man's PSA had jumped into the 8’s and by the way his Vitamin D level was profoundly low, Bill wondered if they were related. He called me (Dr. John Antonucci) and I looked into it.
It’s true: low levels of vitamin D are associated with elevated PSA levels. Now why would a gland buried deep where there is no sun, and only interested in reproduction, be in a relationship with Vitamin D?

That relationship is complex. Research shows:
Vitamin D insufficiency is associated with a higher risk of adverse effects from paclitaxel, a chemotherapy related to docitaxel. Might vitamin D supplementation help with adverse effects? (Ciao-Sin Chen)
In African American men, vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased odds of prostate cancer diagnosis on biopsy. In both European American and AA men, severe vitamin D deficiency was positively associated with higher Gleason grade and tumor stage. (Murphy)
In another study men were given 3000IU vitamin D or placebo and their testosterone levels were followed. Compared to baseline values, a significant increase in total testosterone levels were observed in the vitamin D supplemented group, and no significant change in testosterone in the placebo group, suggesting vitamin D supplementation might increase testosterone levels.
The incidence of prostate cancer and mortality is higher with low vitamin D throughout adulthood (Mucci). But do we have evidence that correcting low vitamin D is actually associated with a reduction in the risk of prostate cancer? No. (Ryan and Mucci)

In a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) of Vitamin D3 supplementation (4,000 IU/d) vs. placebo in men with prostate cancer under active surveillance there was no significant difference in PSA change after 1 year. High-dose vitamin D supplementation did not lower PSA levels or slow progression. (Marshall)
Similarly, the ProsD trial aimed to determine if oral vitamin D supplementation could prevent prostate cancer (PrCa) progression in men on active surveillance (AS), and found that it did not.(Visalini Nair-Shalliker)
In VITAL trial data, which randomized over 25,000 participants to Vitamin D3 (2,000 IU/d) or placebo, Vitamin D supplementation did not significantly improve overall survival or reduce PSA progression compared to placebo.(Chandler)
Recall that a high PSA in the setting of low vitamin D is not specific for cancer. It only signals that the prostate is more active or "leaky" for some reason, but does not prove cancer is present. While low vitamin D and high PSA are associated, the elevated PSA is not proven to be from prostate cancer—it could be from a variety of benign or inflammatory prostate conditions.

Is all this important? After all, what is the prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency? It depends on the definition. Studies in North America and Europe generally define Vitamin D deficiency as a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level below 20 ng/mL. Estimates of deficiency in men with prostate cancer typically range from 30% to 80%. (Murphy et al)
In Murphy's study, among 120 men with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer in Chicago, 40% were vitamin D deficient and 32% were insufficient. (Cutoffs at 20 and 30 mg/ml)
Trump et al. (Ed: do we trust Trump numbers?) reported in a review that ~40–50% of men with prostate cancer are vitamin D deficient, and rates of insufficiency are even higher.
Bermingham reported in a meta-analysis of 21 studies, 54% of men with prostate cancer were vitamin D deficient.
These are amazingly high numbers.

What might be going on here? Here are some ideas:
- Vitamin D plays a key role in regulating cell proliferation (decrease), differentiation (increase), and apoptosis (increase) in prostate--and presumably prostate cancer--tissue.
- Adequate vitamin D levels may suppress abnormal cell growth and reduce inflammation, potentially limiting prostate tissue hyperactivity or benign hypertrophy, which can elevate PSA levels.
- Vitamin D has immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties.
- Chronic inflammation in the prostate is associated with increased PSA levels, maybe by leading to PSA leakage into the bloodstream.
- Vitamin D interacts with androgen signaling pathways, which are central to prostate cancer biology. D-deficiency may alter androgen receptor activity, potentially leading to increased prostate cell activity or turnover, reflected as higher PSA.
- Vitamin D influences the prostate’s microenvironment by modulating growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular matrix components.
- Deficiency may therefore promote a pro-inflammatory, pro-proliferative environment, increasing PSA levels.
- Low vitamin D often correlates with reduced sun exposure, poor nutrition, or other health issues which may independently influence PSA levels or prostate health, confounding the association.
-Vitamin D levels are also inversely correlated with prostate volume.
-At high levels Vitamin D may even be bad for the prostate.

Whatever the mechanism is, let’s make sure our elevated PSA levels are not related to Vitamin D. There are of course many things that influence PSA levels. Try to get a Vitamin D level during the diagnostic process. Don't let the lab make you sign a self-pay paper, write me if insurance or Medicare won't pay. Vitamin D is found in fatty fish, egg yolks, and D-fortified cereals, OJ, real and plant milks, and sun.
By the way, despite some of the findings above, when Bill’s guy was put on vitamin D replacement, his PSA went down to the 3’s.

John (dr.john@ancan.org)

Editors Note: You will have picked this up from reading carefully, but be sure to test Vitamin D - Hydroxy 25

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for copyman @copyman

Now that I think of it my Vitamin D has always been low. I just looked at a 2014 blood test and it was at 15 then, my PSA was 5. Recent blood test it was still low in the 20's. And I do take D3 supplements 2000 to 5000 IU's (not every day) and it still hasn't gone up over the years. My PSA has stayed in the 35-40 range the last 8 months so it seems there is some correlation with D levels & high PSA. I'm curious to see if my D will finally go up once I start treatment or maybe after completed.

Jump to this post

@copyman
Since normal is 20, you are at least above the normal level now for vitamin D.

With as much as you were taking, it’s time to get out in the sun? :-). Winter is over.

I wonder what it is that caused your vitamin D to stay so low. You are taking a lot of vitamin D.

REPLY
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@copyman
Since normal is 20, you are at least above the normal level now for vitamin D.

With as much as you were taking, it’s time to get out in the sun? :-). Winter is over.

I wonder what it is that caused your vitamin D to stay so low. You are taking a lot of vitamin D.

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc
Normal range for Vitamin D, 25-Hydroxy on blood work I get is 30-100. I have never been over 30. Highest I've ever got was 28. It makes since now that you posted about high PSA presents with low Vitamin D. I really feel it's related.

REPLY
Profile picture for heavyphil @heavyphil

@copyman Before my cancer diagnosis I was concerned that my Vitamin D level of 22 was too low; I had read much about how important it was for general health and the prostate in particular. My GP was not very supportive and told me I was fine.
So of course I started taking 5000D daily with K2 or K3? and something else for absorption; I also bought a tanning machine (only UVB rays for protection against skin cancer) and used it 3X/week for 20 mins as recommended.
Did this for six months and had my blood re-tested…22 AGAIN!!
My GP laughed at me and said in all his years of practice MOST people cannot raise their blood levels of D no matter what they do.
My wife did - significantly and with NO sunlamp; just the same D formula I’d been using…go figure.
I often wonder if D is just overhyped like most other supplements and the only increase to be found is in the bank accounts of the companies who sell it.
Phil

Jump to this post

@heavyphil Perhaps it was due to the cancer making it low? I think I've read some of your posts and you have treated your PC. What about your D levels now after treatment, did they go up?

REPLY
Profile picture for copyman @copyman

@jeffmarc
Normal range for Vitamin D, 25-Hydroxy on blood work I get is 30-100. I have never been over 30. Highest I've ever got was 28. It makes since now that you posted about high PSA presents with low Vitamin D. I really feel it's related.

Jump to this post

@copyman
My labs seem to use lower numbers for normal.

REPLY
Profile picture for copyman @copyman

@heavyphil Perhaps it was due to the cancer making it low? I think I've read some of your posts and you have treated your PC. What about your D levels now after treatment, did they go up?

Jump to this post

@copyman I’ve stopped testing for it. My mother died a month short of her 99th birthday and was chronically low in Vitamin D…although that could have been from the 3 packs of cigarettes/day she smoked for her entire life…🤔

REPLY
Profile picture for heavyphil @heavyphil

@copyman Before my cancer diagnosis I was concerned that my Vitamin D level of 22 was too low; I had read much about how important it was for general health and the prostate in particular. My GP was not very supportive and told me I was fine.
So of course I started taking 5000D daily with K2 or K3? and something else for absorption; I also bought a tanning machine (only UVB rays for protection against skin cancer) and used it 3X/week for 20 mins as recommended.
Did this for six months and had my blood re-tested…22 AGAIN!!
My GP laughed at me and said in all his years of practice MOST people cannot raise their blood levels of D no matter what they do.
My wife did - significantly and with NO sunlamp; just the same D formula I’d been using…go figure.
I often wonder if D is just overhyped like most other supplements and the only increase to be found is in the bank accounts of the companies who sell it.
Phil

Jump to this post

Well I said earlier everybody is different in their make up ; I often wonder who "they" are that correlate low vitamin D to increased PDA levels. No disrespect to jeffmarc and his comment. I guess my thinking is my oncologist did genetic testing for PC . how do they test genetically and it be the standard for everyone although we are genetically predisposed uniquely and individually. I'm not trying to critical of anyone comments on here so forgive me if I have offended anyone and I'll keep my thoughts to myself LOVE all yall and hope each has a good day

REPLY
Profile picture for heavyphil @heavyphil

@copyman Before my cancer diagnosis I was concerned that my Vitamin D level of 22 was too low; I had read much about how important it was for general health and the prostate in particular. My GP was not very supportive and told me I was fine.
So of course I started taking 5000D daily with K2 or K3? and something else for absorption; I also bought a tanning machine (only UVB rays for protection against skin cancer) and used it 3X/week for 20 mins as recommended.
Did this for six months and had my blood re-tested…22 AGAIN!!
My GP laughed at me and said in all his years of practice MOST people cannot raise their blood levels of D no matter what they do.
My wife did - significantly and with NO sunlamp; just the same D formula I’d been using…go figure.
I often wonder if D is just overhyped like most other supplements and the only increase to be found is in the bank accounts of the companies who sell it.
Phil

Jump to this post

@heavyphil
The full set of related supplements is vitamin D, K2, and Mg (magnesium).
Was that maybe your third supplement?
If not, try adding an Mg supplement - or have a few almonds every day as a good source of magnesium.

The "normal" range of 20 or so turns out to be minimal, not optimal, it means you don't suffer from rickets but your immune system is much happier if the range is 50 or higher.

Conventional medicine pays FAR too little attention to nutrition, it looks for horrible deficiency with symptoms like rickets but it has no conception of "optimal". You know why? Because the range of "medicine" was standardized in 1910 by the Flexner report to eliminate fraud and snake oil, and in 1910 we had not yet even conceptualized the term "vitamin", there were no vitamins! And nobody has updated the scope in 116 years!?!?!?!?!

REPLY
Profile picture for asolidrock @asolidrock

Well I said earlier everybody is different in their make up ; I often wonder who "they" are that correlate low vitamin D to increased PDA levels. No disrespect to jeffmarc and his comment. I guess my thinking is my oncologist did genetic testing for PC . how do they test genetically and it be the standard for everyone although we are genetically predisposed uniquely and individually. I'm not trying to critical of anyone comments on here so forgive me if I have offended anyone and I'll keep my thoughts to myself LOVE all yall and hope each has a good day

Jump to this post

@asolidrock
What I posted had references To the doctors that came up with a vitamin D information.

You mention genetically, But genetics has nothing to do with what their study shows.

What I posted at the top aren’t my Comments they are from medical groups that have evaluated vitamin D as a possible culprit in high PSA. The full article was written by a doctor who investigated this.

REPLY
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@asolidrock
What I posted had references To the doctors that came up with a vitamin D information.

You mention genetically, But genetics has nothing to do with what their study shows.

What I posted at the top aren’t my Comments they are from medical groups that have evaluated vitamin D as a possible culprit in high PSA. The full article was written by a doctor who investigated this.

Jump to this post

Im sorry Jeffmarc I hope I didn't offend you.; I probably need ro keep.my mouth closed. Thanks again for being a big help those who are ignorant and unlearned like me

REPLY
Profile picture for carbcounter @carbcounter

@heavyphil
The full set of related supplements is vitamin D, K2, and Mg (magnesium).
Was that maybe your third supplement?
If not, try adding an Mg supplement - or have a few almonds every day as a good source of magnesium.

The "normal" range of 20 or so turns out to be minimal, not optimal, it means you don't suffer from rickets but your immune system is much happier if the range is 50 or higher.

Conventional medicine pays FAR too little attention to nutrition, it looks for horrible deficiency with symptoms like rickets but it has no conception of "optimal". You know why? Because the range of "medicine" was standardized in 1910 by the Flexner report to eliminate fraud and snake oil, and in 1910 we had not yet even conceptualized the term "vitamin", there were no vitamins! And nobody has updated the scope in 116 years!?!?!?!?!

Jump to this post

@carbcounter yup - magnesium glycinate…and I’ve always eaten plenty of nuts (too many sometimes) and foods high in Vitamin D…it’s just ME and because we’re all different I don’t worry about it any longer.
It’s true that extreme deficiencies get all the attention and ‘optimal’ might just be unattainable for everyone. Thanks!
Phil

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.