Treating Osteoporosis: What works for you?

Posted by heritage1955 @heritage1955, Apr 1, 2016

Hi. I'm new to the site and am interested in treating osteoperosis. I'm 39 yo and recently had a bone density that showed I'm at -2.4. So, going through the intial "I can't believe it" stuff. 🙂

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Osteoporosis & Bone Health Support Group.

So to repeat: Tymlos and Forteo can be used to heal the atypical fractures caused by anti-resorptives like biphosphonates and Prolia. Their main action is to build new (quality) bone.

Forteo can now be used for more than two years.

@catluvr999 we don't know your spine score. My reports say that the femur neck score is not reliable for measuring changes. A score of -2.8 is not terribly severe as yet and if you don't have fractures, insurance may not cover the bone-growing drugs. Have you checked insurance?

One big problem with osteoporosis treatment is that the bone-growing drugs (Forteo, Tymlos and Evenity) apparently are most effective if you have not taken Prolia or biphosphonates. But doctors use the latter two meds as "front line" and insurance only covers the bone-growing drugs if you have not tolerated the others (and have severe osteoporosis and/or fractures).

With a score of -2.8, if your spinal scores are also in that range, I would consider Keith McCormick's "The Whole Body Approach to Osteoporosis" and maybe Lani Simpson MD's Facebook page. Margaret Martin has great exercises.

You can sort of run out of time with meds. I don't know your age. If, say, you do biphosphonates for 5-10 years then the allowed 2 of Tymlos, and/or 1 of Evenity, then you are left with only Prolia. Apparently people are doing Prolia forever but there are those risks of ONJ and atypical fracture, and other concerns about that drug.

The DEXA scan results are not linear even if you use the same machine. You have to look at the trend. One score will go down, then up, then down, but the overall trend of the report will be clear. Keep a chart over the years.

I have 7 spinal fractures. I could not tolerate Forteo and tried hard to get on it before my fractures. Even saw an immunologist to try to desensitize. I was on cancer meds but my doc did not want to try Reclast because of afib (that concern has been discounted) and he does not use Prolia. I tried to get into the Tymlos patch study. Then I fractured.

I guess my point is, do what you can now but don't wait too long for meds. I wish I had discovered Tymlos. But even that was a problem at first. I could not tolerate a full or even half dose. I ended up in the ER. I quit. Met with a bunch of MD's. Restarted Tymlos at 2 clicks out of 8 and moved up slowly. It's been 10 months now and side effects become minimal if you stick with it. I wish I had known all this before fracturing but I can still stand up straight! But lots of pain and disability.

You can meet with Keith McCormick online. Lani Simpson has workshops on various topics. But if your scores get worse and if your spine is worse than that -2.8, think about meds regardless of side effects!

My plan is to do Tymlos and then Evenity if I still need to grow bone. Then according to doc, hopefully low dose Reclast with a long infusion, careful monitoring, and breaks in meds if safe. My doc has me choose, and you can always make your own choices regardless of what a doc recommends.

REPLY

Yes. I got both hips and lumbar spine scanned. I have put my scores in my bio, if you want to click my username. This was my 4th scan since 2006. Unfortunately No doctor ever told me we should get our scan done on the same machine each time for an accurate comparison....I found out through my osteoporosis research and came across that. To make the comparison even worse than not being on the same machine, my scans were also on a variety of *brand* machines. Hologic has a different report format than GE does, for example....two of the common brands...the Hologic reports are much clearer to understand., IMHO. If I ever get another scan again I'll be sure to get one on a machine that has a Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) application on it, which I learned about after doing the scan. A TBS score apparently gives additional info about the bones....more about the structure that's not strictly the bone density, if I'm using Sara Meeks' (physical therapist) terminology right. She does seminars and has videos on YouTube, etc., and seems quite renown. Hopefully Echolight or some other non-radiation method will come to San Diego soon....another option instead of dexa. So much to learn.....

REPLY
@catluvr999

Hi Chris @artscaping. Can you relay what t scores you had that mayo clinic said didn't warrant medication at that point....and any other context that you think might be helpful? I try following the threads back to a beginning to see context....the start of people's journeys on this site.... but I fail miserably. I wish a part of everyone's bio gave the start of their journey. I think I'll add mine now in my bio.

I liked into mayo clinic but was told or first visit need to be in person. Was that the car for you? I'm not a traveler but maybe at since point I'll do it.

Jump to this post

@catluv999. Hello and thanks for your inquiry. I think the issue was mostly that my wrist scores were used as a basis for the decision. According to my doctor, wrist scores are not a reliable source for placing someone on medication. I will check and see if I have those scores and get back to you. Let me bookmark this post so I can find it again.

Did you have both hip and spine scores?

Chris

REPLY
@catluvr999

Thanks. Yes I have a primary doctor....and will finally get an Endocrinologist appt...Dr Gina Woods.... in October, who I'm hopeful won't jump to a fosamax/Alendronate recommendation like my doctor did. I only got in about 10 of my 20+ questions w my doctor during our virtual appt....during which I pressed for investigating possible secondary causes of my -2.8 hip t score, which she obliged in spite of saying my Z scores would be what indicates a possible secondary cause to blame and they don't.

Jump to this post

As far as I know, the only thing that the Z-score does is compare one's gm/cm² DEXA result with that for others in the same age group. (Whereas the T-score compares the result with those for women age 30, if I recall the age correctly.) But how would that determine secondary causation?

One of my frustrations with DEXA tests is how little actual valuable data they yield. But I'm unaware of what can be deduced from them with respect to cause and would appreciate hearing more. Unless one has a significantly unusual score (an outlier or zebra in stat terms) that reveals some underlying undiagnosed condition that affects bone density beyond declining estrogen due to age or other estrogen depletion?

REPLY
@artscaping

Good afternoon @toni7. Your concerns are legitimate. And the basket of options can be extremely confusing. There are three rather new medications that require injections and have been developed to build bone. The one with the longest medical history is Forteo. The next one is Tymlos. Both are taken for two years. The newest one is Evenity which not only builds bones but also protects the bone from reabsorption during the one year schedule.

Because of uncomfortable side effects with bisphosphonates, I chose two years of Tymlos. My scores for hips returned to the osteopenia level and the other scores remained stationary which means they held their own. I had no side effects except for the first few days. They were unspectacular.....and disappeared in a couple of weeks.

Then came the hard part. What next? Moving to Evenity would mean a rapid building of more bone and a less active effort at protecting as the research begins to show. Since my unfortunate reaction with Boniva, it appeared that I only had one choice and that would be Prolia.

I did finish a year on Prolia with concerning side effects and unimpressive Dexa scores. I secured periodontist exam reports indicating that so far there was no damage to my jaw and that my teeth would probably not need any surgery or implant treatments.

Nothing felt right to me so I asked for a consult in Endocrinology at Mayo Clinic. Here is what I discovered. At the age of 77, when I was told that I needed to begin the osteoporosis medications, that recommendation was way too aggressive. I did not need any bone-building or bone protection at that point based on my scores. There seems to be some anxiety among endocrinologists and other clinicians to make sure everyone gets going on something.

So......now I was in a "pickle". Evenity was too new without enough research for me and only possible for a year. Again....then what? The Mayo endocrinologist went back to look at the once-a-month biphosphonate dosage which resulted in side effects. What if you took the bone-protecting biphosphonate, alendronate, weekly instead of monthly? The dosage of one infusion a month was just too heavy for me.

So.....four weeks ago I began to take one tablet, not an injection, every Monday morning. And as you might be beginning to realize......it is working. No side effects, no joint pain, no jaw or teeth or gum pain. No nausea or injection soreness.

So just backing off from the more infrequent heavy doses is the answer for me. It might also be worth discussing with your clinician. Questions??????

May you be safe, protected, and free from inner and outer harm.
And thanks Mayo Clinic.

Chris

Jump to this post

Hi Chris @artscaping. Can you relay what t scores you had that mayo clinic said didn't warrant medication at that point....and any other context that you think might be helpful? I try following the threads back to a beginning to see context....the start of people's journeys on this site.... but I fail miserably. I wish a part of everyone's bio gave the start of their journey. I think I'll add mine now in my bio.

I liked into mayo clinic but was told or first visit need to be in person. Was that the car for you? I'm not a traveler but maybe at since point I'll do it.

REPLY
@callalloo

There are a handful of choices with respect to drugs for osteoporosis and, regrettably, none of them perfect or free of thought-provoking side effects and potential side effects. If there is one that does "make bones healthy" as the pharmacist mentioned, I've not heard of it. Unless she was referring to the few drugs that seem to trigger the growth of new bone?

I've wondered too why and how bisphosphonates can induce those longitudinal fractures of the femur (or osteonecrosis in rare cases for that matter). I suspect as you do that there's something else happening when old dead bone cells aren't being slouched off?

Jump to this post

I think that by "medication that can make your bones healthy" she meant the vitamins she then listed....even though literally that's not what her specific words meant ("there are medications....and that's why you should take vitamins...."). Yep, a useless discussion with a professional. And I always have such hope.🥴

REPLY
@callalloo

The other article is more thorough. Mayo Clinic has articles as well. There's no shortage of info, but there is, in my mind, a shortage of drugs that can do what we need most....help keep healthy, renewing, resilient bones...with no downside risk. The science isn't quite there yet.

Jump to this post

Thanks. There's no shortage of info for sure. I understand that it's not possible to completely boil down a lot of this info into an easily digestible comparison table, but I truly think it's possible to come close. I did it as a technical writer translating complex system relationships into a simplified chronological flow diagram....and if I can do it, anyone can.....well, almost anyone.😆

REPLY
@windyshores

@catluvr999 Tymlos and Forteo do not affect resorption the way the other drugs do, and works with the parathyroid. Do you have a doctor?

They may have some minimal impact:

"Tymlos acts like PTH, binding to one of the PTH receptors in your bone. The type of receptor it binds to and the way in which it binds promotes bone formation and minimizes the other function of PTH, namely bone resorption, and calcium release."

Anabolics like Tymlos and Forteo work mainly by building bone, whereas biphosphonates and Prolia work by affecting resorption. Tymlos and Forteo do not cause the dental/ONJ issues or atypical fractures that may happen (if rarely) with the other drugs.

Evenity does both and does carry the risk of ONJ or atypical fractures but is only used for one year.

It might reassure you that anabolics like Tymlos and Forteo may be used to heal the atypical fractures caused by biphosphonates (or PRolia).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4691592/
Background
"Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the most commonly used anti-osteoporotic drugs, which have been proven to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. However, use of BPs, particularly for long periods of time, is associated with an increased risk of atypical femoral fracture (AFF). Healing of BP-associated AFF is usually delayed because of suppressed bone turnover. Teriparatide (TPTD), a recombinant form of parathyroid hormone (PTH), enhances bone healing in patients with delayed healing or non-union."

Jump to this post

Thanks. Yes I have a primary doctor....and will finally get an Endocrinologist appt...Dr Gina Woods.... in October, who I'm hopeful won't jump to a fosamax/Alendronate recommendation like my doctor did. I only got in about 10 of my 20+ questions w my doctor during our virtual appt....during which I pressed for investigating possible secondary causes of my -2.8 hip t score, which she obliged in spite of saying my Z scores would be what indicates a possible secondary cause to blame and they don't.

REPLY
@catluvr999

Thanks. Their table at the bottom of the article got me excited until I saw the super poorly done Dosing column that gives a mixed bag of mechanism of action/purpose and delivery system. Sheesh!

Jump to this post

The other article is more thorough. Mayo Clinic has articles as well. There's no shortage of info, but there is, in my mind, a shortage of drugs that can do what we need most....help keep healthy, renewing, resilient bones...with no downside risk. The science isn't quite there yet.

REPLY
@callalloo

Here's a quick overview from Harvard Health on the different drugs currently used to treat osteoporosis. The side
effects and risks vary widely so this is just a survey of what's currently on offer. I've read studies looking at which alleles on which genes seem to be most prognostic of osteoporosis so hope that genetic testing might also offer some guidance in the near future.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/womens-health/osteoporosis-drugs-which-one-is-right-for-you

Jump to this post

Thanks. Their table at the bottom of the article got me excited until I saw the super poorly done Dosing column that gives a mixed bag of mechanism of action/purpose and delivery system. Sheesh!

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.