Help finding a study re treatment: EBRT plus ADT vs ADT alone
First visit with RO yesterday re: treatment of my "low volume mCSPC". I came away with two things he stated in the "studies have shown" category that I wanted to follow up on:
1) IMRT vs PBRT - similar results with no discernable difference in complications or side effects. I've found quite a few references to this and am confident I can make an informed decision as to which to choose if the time comes.
2) EBRT of the prostate plus ADT shows significant improvement in survival rate and longevity over ADT alone. I cannot find any specific reference to this. Can someone point me in the right direction?
My decision point at this time is EBRT or not to EBRT. I would like to be able to make that decision based on reading actual references as to the validity of my RO's statement.
To be clear, I have found numerous statements that EBRT plus ADT is standard protocol for low volume mCSPC, but cannot find any referring to specific studies. Do I get an extra 6 months, 1-2 years, 2-5 years? It matters as to whether I go through 1-1/2 months of daily treatments coupled with the side effect risks or not. Thanks in advance for any help.
Specific diagnostic criteria of my case can be found in my 2 previous discussion topics.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Hi, Brian: I am not sure if I answered all your questions the other day. They are using target radiation for the lymph nodes and the cancer in the prostate. They said there is no need for genetic testing because, although his father had prostate cancer, he didn't develop it until perhaps the age of 70. (My husband is 69). The oncologist said it would be different if his father had developed it at 40 or 50. As well, he said there is not an indication of a need for the spacer because he has no bowel issues.... and he would have had to be sent to a city 4 hours away for that process. I will try to look up the Novartis PSMAddition to see if I can learn anything. I really don't feel that he should be on hormone therapy forever. That seems like a life sentence. I am encouraging him to do the weights and he has started doing that every other day. That makes me feel happy (for him and for me). I have found that there is another second generation drug, an option to abariterone which has fewer side effects. When we meet with the doctors this week, I am going to ask about it. I have found a site PCRI.org which specializes in prostate cancer and the doctor Mark Scholz seems so knowledgeable. I watch their videos daily. I am so thankful that there are people out there, like yourself, and others, who are willing to share what they know so that we don't feel as though we are all alone. Our cancer centre is brand new and is supposed to be state of the art but I feel, being a Canadian hospital, it still cannot measure up to what you have in the States.
These charts show info about the other 2nd generation hormone therapies (called androgen receptor pathway inhibitors).
Thank you for the charts. Now I do remember. Dr. Scholz suggested that daralutamide didn't have as many side effects as the abiratarone. I see that Abiratarone is generic and less expensive.
I have always feared prednisone. He is taking that along with the abiratarone and I know it has its function. He is only taking 5 mg. But it still concerns me.
How do you know all this? Did you just research it all when you were having your treatments? I am the one doing the researching. My husband isn't interested in it. I am not sure that is because he is starting to become a bit depressed or just that he is not one to ruffle anyone's feathers. He calls me his little bull dog.
prednisone is required because abiraterone stops production of cortisol, Which partially regulates sleep. Too little cortisol and you are exhausted. For some people, the 5 mg of prednisone aren’t enough and they have terrible fatigue problems. In that case, they are given 10 mg of prednisone, Which is actually one of the recommended dosages.
I have one person I’m working with that would wake up in the morning and then have to go back to sleep for two or three hours because he was so exhausted. Switching to 10 mg stopped him having to do that.
Look into the Stampede study out of England. It is pretty comprehensive