Gleason 7 (4+3) radiation, but ADT also? Over treatment?
Hello,
I will be 80 next August and apart from newly diagnosed PC am in good overall health. I have a diagnosis of Gleason 7 (4+3) Grade 3, T2a with a five year PSA of 0.6. Six cores positive in the recent biopsy. No spread to the bones or organs as indicated by CT scans etc. I see my urologist on 7th January and am concerned that he will propose ADT in addition to the inevitable RT ( I suspect IRMT ).
The side effects concern me ( although I already have erectile dysfunction ) mostly those concern possible memory loss, bone and muscle loss and cardiovascular risk ( I have controlled high blood pressure ).
I have read several recent reports that indicate that ADT may represent overtreatment in older patients and the more so where the cancer grows more slowly. Quality of life is key for me and my wife.
Can anyone please give a measured/qualified overview please. Thank you.
David
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Thanks for this - really helpful perspective. Trying to find a middle way ( seeking a 'cure' but also Q of L and minimizing side effects is quite a task. Quite clear that overtreatment is becoming recognized as an issue especially for older patients.
Thanks again.
David
Thanks Ron, that is exactly where I am at ( or suspect I will be when I see my guy on 7th January ). After tons of research, I was beginning to feel a bit lonely out there in terms of not going with the flow. Great reinforcement.
Best regards,
David
Happy to discuss my story in more detail if it would help you. Best, Ron
That would be great and thanks again. Just to clarify, I am Grade 3, Gleason 7
( 4+3 ) T2a, but with a consistent 5 year PSA of 0.6 and no symptoms. A key factor is that there is a genetic link to my late brother who died of PC. Localized to one half of the prostate hence the T2a rating and nothing in the bones or organs.
Any perspective / input would be more than helpful ( I trust that you are on an even keel now btw ). Meeting on the 7th here in France with the HOD of urology at our regional hospital no doubt to discuss treatment options. His proposal will be based on findings of a panel comprising urologist, oncologist and radiologist. He however seems very keen on ADT.
Look forward to your story.
Best regards,
David
David, my PSA had been increasing for several years and my PCP sent me to a urologist. It turns out that because I had been taking medication to help reduce the number of night "pee" trips, my actual PSA was double (9) the number that was indicated by yearly lab tests.
A biopsy was quickly performed which when reviewed by a pathologist indicated 6 out of 12 cores contained cancer , four of which were 4+3 with the remaining two 3 + 3.
Consulted with a urologist and radiologist both of which indicated ADT was required. In the meantime, I had an MRI to look for any spread and had a 2nd pathologist from John's Hopkins perform a review of the cores which confirmed the findings of the first pathologist,
I had to wait several weeks to have a PSMA pet scan to look for spread and it confirmed there was none outside of the prostate. Your research has probably made you aware that a PSMA pet scan is significantly more effective than an MRI in finding cancer outside the prostate .
(continued) I had a Decipher test performed which evaluates the aggressiveness of your particular cancer and mine was slightly below the mid range.
Decided I was leaning toward Proton Therapy and consulted with Proton Therapy radiologist who also strongly recommended ADT.
Consulted with widely known 2nd Proton Therapy radiologist who indicated that he believed expected lifespan gain from ADT was largely, but certainly not completely, offset by negative health effects it can bring.
(continued) This information gave me confidence to go in the direction I was already leaning toward which was no ADT.
Had six weeks of Proton radiation in May and June of 2022 and PSA has continued to decline to below 1 as of the most recent two quarterly PSA tests. Only minor residual side effects from radiation which are weak stream and an occasional dribble. Hope this helps! Best , Ron
Ron,
Thanks again - really helpful. Not clear at this point about the difference Proton and IRMT but will research. Is there less likely hood of burns to the rectal wall with proton which I take to be more accurate/focussed?
My MRT came after an Echography which first revealed the tumour/nodule, then the biopsy and then a bone scan followed by CT scan.
End of questions!
Happy New Year
David
Bonne continuation, and thank you for sharing.
David
Not particularly relevant to the discussion, but what instrument and kind of music do you play? I play keyboards (not well) and have a great admiration for musicians who are better than me.