Firsthand Experience with Fenbendazole, Ivermectin, Lactoferrin?

If you’d like to see the evidence on Apegenin and Liposomole Artimisinin and Fenbendazole, see https://evidence.zone for details (a free resource that reviews the evidence for interventions in prostate cancer across diet, exercise, lifestyle, supplements and compounds).

Why do you ask? There are ADT medications that are HIGHLY effective and whose side-effects are, frankly, in the category of "first-world problems". (I currently have those SEs, and after the initial shock I know how lucky I am compared to people missing limbs, with cognitive impairment, with mobility issues or even bedridden, etc.)

So why even inquire about medications whose enduring fame started with misplaced distrust in a medical establishment that has spent billions and performed endless studies to test and verify the effectiveness of some pretty incredible recent advancements? It's our lives that are at stake, and the pleasure of indulging in a conspiracy theory, or thinking without basis that we have some kind of inside information, is just not worth it.

@paulsweeney I was skeptical of your post, but a thorough visit seems to confirm that this is an honest, scientific site.

@readandlearn I appreciate the feedback. Let me know if you have any thoughts on how to make it more useful

@guybe Your shared 'opinion' is exactly why I asked for feedback from those with 'firsthand experience'.

@guybe I applaud your post!👏👏👏
When I saw my PSA plummet after just one month on Orgovyx I decided it was a miracle drug as far as PCa was concerned.
Side effects ? Sure! What life saving drug doesn’t have them?? But sitting in the waiting room at Sloan, looking at all those poor souls, frail, bald and in some cases shaking, with their IV drips suspended over their wheelchairs, I realized how lucky I really was.
Veterinary de-wormer?? No thanks!! Great post,
Phil

@cxracer
Howdy. My start, when my PSA was 19 and biopsy showed Gleason 8 but unable to start radiation I took Fenbendazole (in both powder and liquid forms) for the 2 months I had to wait. I can easily say it had no effect, proved by PSA jumping to 219 during that time....

There are 'glowing testimonials' about many herbs and other alternative 'treatments' but I agree with @guybe...why take a chance, because a chance is all these things are...

@heavyphil
Amen to that...even at my advanced stage (Now on Pluvicto) I've had relatively few side effects. Every month at the cancer center shows me what I COULD look like!!

Blessings to all!!

@deccakid Thank you for sharing your 'first hand' experience.

6.6 or 6.7 was the second and last PSA test that I was allowed, and that was like in August of 2025. It had climbed within a months' time from my first PSA test of 6.2. I decided taking a 'chance' was worth it to me, so I took FenBen and IVR prior to my RARP on 4/9/26. I wasn't allowed another PSA test prior to surgery, even though I requested one several times, so I have no idea where my PSA level was. I'm currently taking another 'chance' month of FenBen and IVR. It's not harming me in any way. I am taking additional supplements to support my liver, and I'm extremely healthy, other than the prostate cancer, which pathology results indicate was 100% contained within my prostate and all margines were clear.

Only the oncologist / radiologist I consulted with suggested radiation and ADT (testosterone blocker meds). Go figure... Everyone else I consulted with said surgery was my only viable option, (due to the cancer being present throughout my entire prostate), and that ADT would be horrible for me.

Zero medications have been prescribed to me. Just surgery. Taking FenBen and IVR at least allows me to feel like I'm being proactive on my end, even IF it's not doing anything productive for me.

At the very least, I know I'm parasite free.

I've posted these before...but, may be time to drag them out again...

Tips to be your own best researcher, https://ancan.org/helpful-tips-to-be-your-own-best-medical-researcher/

Anecdotal Evidence - information that has been observed by the person reporting but not verified. Be skeptical of anecdotal evidence such as personal stories. It is not scientifically reliable. Focus on information supported by scientific evidence and clinical studies.

The quality levels of evidence from highest to lowest for medical data are:

Systematic reviews: collect and evaluate all available data/evidence within the researchers’ criteria. An example is the “Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews”. Meta studies are a systematic review.

Randomized controlled trials: participants are randomly assigned to experimental and control arms. The double-blind trial is the gold-standard of medical research where neither the participants nor the researchers know the placebo or medication/treatment is given. This is to prevent bias and to ensure the validity and reliability of the study.

Cohort observational study: participants with common traits or exposure to the proposed medications or treatments are followed over a long period of time.

Case study or report: a detailed report of result after treatment of an individual. This is formalized and reviewed anecdotal evidence.

Phases of medical trial studies cited by published medical papers:

Pre-clinical studies: laboratory experiments using cell cultures, animal or computer models. In vitro means tested In Vitro – literally ‘in glass’ means testing outside a living organism, in a test tube or petri dish, In Vivo – literally in life -means testing in a living organism, often mice. Then studies move on to humans…

Phase I trials: assess safety, dosage and side effects of the proposed medications or treatment.

Phase II trials: expand P 1 to evaluate efficacy of the proposed medications or treatment – how well it works..

Phase III trials: confirm efficacy, safety, dosage and to evaluate side effects of the proposed medications or treatment in much larger samples. This is often where randomized blind and double blind design is used. Blind means the patient does not know what they are getting; double blind means neither the patient nor the clinician know what is being dosed.

Phase IV trials: monitor long term effectiveness and safety of the medication or treatment.

Some terms regarding statistical data cited in medical journals are explained as follows:
N = number of participants: be wary of studies with a very low N.
HR = hazard ratio: HR=1 – there is no change in the proposed medication/treatment compared to control baseline. HR< 1 – there is a reduction of risks with the proposed medication/treatment. HR>1 – there is an increase risk with the proposed medication/treatment.
CI = Confidence Interval: A trial shows that a particular drug has a 20% effect within a certain time frame with 95% CI. This shows that the study, if repeated many times, it will be 95% confident that the 20% reduction will be consistently observed.
P-value = Probability Value: This measures how strong the evidence is that the hypothesis, or effect being tested, is correct, rather than the result being random, or incorrect (null hypothesis). We seek a P-value that is < =0.05 meaning that there is a 95% or better likelihood the result is attributable to what is being tested.

I'm here 12+ years after diagnosis in part because I've stuck with the science.

That's not just my PCa, Afib, TIA, DVT and PE..

Kevin