Does Rheumatology in Rochester see patients long term"?
I have been treated for over 20 years for Spondyloarthropathy. I have recently moved and the new rheumatologist says "just very severe osteoarthritis". I was referred by primary care to Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville. I was shocked that I got a call the next day and was seen within weeks. I live about 2 hours away. The appointment was fine, I liked the rheumatologist. She too is questioning my previous diagnosis as I may not have enough damage after this many years. (Couldn't that be because I have had outstanding treatment over the years that has controlled the damage?) She is concerned that I have a different autoimmune disease. She has ordered more tests and will be seeing me again, but I was surprised when she asked if I was told that they do not see patients long term and that I needed to find a local rheumatologist that I can work with. 'I really don't want to be over doctored and I am willing to travel for ongoing care. Do the other Mayo Clinic Rheumatology departments have this policy?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Autoimmune Diseases Support Group.
Welcome @greenacressoon, I'm a Mayo Clinic Rochester patient and have seen rheumatology and other specialist when getting a referral from my local Mayo Family Health Clinic near Rochester. I first saw the rheumatologist when I got a referral from my PCP for my PMR prior to being diagnosed back in 2007. I only saw him a few times and I'm sure I would probably get a different rheumatologist if I needed another referral just due to new doctors coming into the clinic. I'm assuming after your rheumatologist has more tests done and meets with you, she will hopefully suggest/start a treatment plan and you won't need her anymore unless something changes which would be where a local doctor/rheumatologist might come in.
Can you ask her what the rheumatologist that ordered more tests and will be seeing you again what seeing patients long term means to her? Also, the Mayo Patient Portal can be helpful if you don't live close. Have you signed up to use the Mayo Clinic Patient Portal?
I don't know for sure because I often find the Mayo Clinic scheduling system confusing and I've heard of others who've said they've "been patients for years," but in my experience, both in doing a workup at Rochester and a few years later at Jacksonville, in both situations, they were very clear that they only see patients for an initial workup. It didn't really seem to matter whether or not I had resources or providers at home who had the related expertise, but I guess the way they see it, they're not able to follow every patient. In releasing you back to your "local care team," they're able to use their resources and expertise in making the complex diagnoses and recommendations and allow others to "follow" us as patients.
@johnbishop had a great suggestion about asking your Mayo rheumatologist what she meant when she said they don't follow patients "long term."
The goal in both of my evaluations with Mayo was to establish a diagnosis and make recommendations for a plan of care that I would take home to my care team. I suspect the outcome would be different if it was a cancer diagnosis or something like that. In my case like you, I had my evaluation with Rheumatology at Rochester in 2017 and began a different evaluation for EDS in Jacksonville in 2022.
Your post caught my eye because I have seronegative spondyloarthropathy and I don't meet many people who have it--actually I've never met anyone else, except on Connect haha. I can relate to your experience of the Mayo rheumatologist being unsure of your diagnosis. When I did my workup at Rochester in 2017, they misdiagnosed me, concluding they had "low suspicion" of an inflammatory arthritis, and they were completely wrong.
I'm not sure if you may have the seronegative version like I do, but my rheumatologist at home explained to me that it's difficult to diagnose because inflammatory markers will usually remain normal, even when someone can have severe pain. Because it causes inflammation at the entheses (the insertion points of the tendons), that type of inflammation or joint damage may not be visible in imaging for years, without treatment.
So they often have to treat it empirically (meaning trial and error); if the symptoms are severe enough and all other potential causes within reason have been ruled out, they would start treatment and if symptoms improve, then it's an assumed spondyloarthropathy diagnosis. I was in a tough spot because the first line empiric treatment is high doses of NSAIDs but I couldn't do that because I only have one kidney. The second line treatment was sulfasalazine, but research shows it's not as effective for peripheral spondyloarthritis, which is what I have.
At the time I went to Mayo, I was still titrating the sulfasalazine, and if it didn't work (which it never did), the next step was a biologic such as Enbrel or Humira. The Rheumatology team at Mayo concluded that the risk of me taking a biologic was not worth trying. But months later I was in such severe pain, my rheumatologist and I decided to try Enbrel and I noticed improvement within less than two weeks.
Now, I have an assumed diagnosis of seronegative spondyloarthropathy. To your point, the kicker is that since I've been treated for it, there's no way to prove objectively with test results that I have it. But if we didn't treat it, the pain would have gotten worse and worse and worse, and my quality of life would have suffered. Maybe then, we'd see joint damage or an increase in my inflammatory markers, but how much pain would I have had to endure?
Anyway, I guess I'm sharing this story because universally the rheumatologists I've seen (3 altogether, aside from the rheumatologist at Mayo, plus I communicate often with my dad's rheumatologist) all said it's difficult to diagnose spondyloarthropathy. (It's probably difficult to diagnose any autoimmune condition that's seronegative or has non-specific lab values). The rheumatologist who diagnosed me was experienced with spondyloarthropathy.
I can only assume that when I was evaluated at Mayo, in 2017, maybe the condition wasn't as well known or it just wasn't something they saw often? I'll never really know why they were so skeptical and so wrong about my diagnoses (I also have other diagnoses they could have found but they completely missed.)
Still, it's very promising your Mayo rheumatologist seems to be thorough and is considering all possible explanations for your symptoms. I'm hoping for you that you'll both be able to come up with something and can find a local rheumatologist if needed to continue your care, who's also a good fit.
Thanks for responding. I do have access to the patient portal. My treatment requires periodic infusions of a biologic medication. I also need blood work frequently due to medications that I take daily. Not having a Rheumatologist that over-sees my care really is not an option. The doctor indicated that they diagnose and start a treatment plan, but do not provide ongoing care. That just seems odd to me - especially in auto-immune conditions that can change in severity over time.
@greenacressoon, like others have mentioned, I would discuss this with your care team at Mayo Clinic. Let them know your concerns and preferences. When patients live a distance from Mayo Clinic, Mayo's specialists will coordinate and work with with local providers. This enables you to benefit from Mayo Clinic's expertise and receive care closer to home, especially for frequent appointment care like infusions and blood work.
I encourage you to ask about follow-up appointments. Many members here have shared how they get a diagnosis and treatment plan with Mayo Clinic specialty teams, receive ongoing care at home and return yearly (or more or less frequently) for check ins at Mayo Clinic for the longer term.
My inflammatory markers do elevate when i am flaring. Also, I am HLA-b27 positive and have a significant family history of spondyloarthropathy (including a couple of my children). When diagnosed I had inflammation in my sacroiliac joints, but both the (new) local rheumatologist and the Mayo Rheumatologist are saying that if there in no additional damage after 20 years, it is likely something else. I could understand that if the disease had gone untreated, but I have been on biologics and anti-inflammatories for 20 years with a goal of slowing or stopping progression. It is frustrating that the Mayo docs don't see and treat patients routinely. I probably would not have gone had I known that. I will continue the search for another new local rheumatologist.
Thank you Colleen. I do have a follow up scheduled to review additional imaging and lab work. I asked the doctor if they see local patients for ongoing care like infusions. She said that they did not and that even local patients still need a local rheumatologist. I guess I am odd because I don't view traveling 2 hours to an appointment to be burdensome. Due to the shortage of pediatric rheumatologists, I was often traveling 4 hours each way to get care for my kids when they were children. I have always had the attitude that it was worth it to travel to get good medical care.