Cribriform cells: Does their presence change treatment approach?

Posted by hans_casteels @hanscasteels, Nov 27, 2024

Does anyone have any insight on how cribriform presence changes approaches or treatment? Are there time constraints? Radiation suggestions that would optimize the destruction of these cribriform - is radiation therapy an option for cribriform cancer in the prostate?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for markrd @markrd

Hi, based on the research I have done for my prostate cancer diagnosis, I think your Urologist is giving you good advice. With a Gleason score of 3+4 and cancer that is contained to the prostate, active surveillance could be one of the options available. I don't say this to suggest this treatment option, but rather to indicate that from the information you have provided, his form of cancer is not aggressive and not likely to progress significantly in six months or likely even longer.

I am also from Canada (central Alberta). Before having a biopsy, I had a PSMA MRI, which detected a small lesion that extended outside the capsule of the prostate. A subsequent biopsy confirmed that the lesion was cancerous (Gleason 4+3) with Cribriform Pattern 4 present. I had a subsequent PSMA PET Scan that showed no indication of spread. Because my cancer had more aggressive indicators than your husbands (i.e., it extended outside of my prostate capsule, was Gleason 4+3 and had Cribriform pattern), I definitely required treatment and had a robot assisted radical prostatectomy on July 14th. My follow-up pathology showed no cancer in any of the margins of what was removed or in removed lymph nodes and seminal vesicles. This was good news and post surgery pathology is standard testing that they will do if your husband opts for surgery.

A few things to consider:
1) Check if the biopsy results mention anything about Cribriform Pattern, which is a more aggressive form. If it was not found this is a good sign.
2) If your husband had a PSMA MRI test before getting a biopsy, this provides an image of prostate and whether the cancer is confined to the prostate or may have spread to surrounding tissues. I was not sure what you meant by "Contained in both side prostate", but if you meant that the cancer is confined to the prostate this is also a good thing.
3) I did a lot of online research from reputable sites and spoke to two different urologists, but I still wasn't sure I knew enough about the treatment options to be sure that a prostatectomy was the best option for me. I decided to book private consults with a urology surgeon and a radiation oncologist at the Mayo Clinic. It cost me a few thousand dollars US, but I was able to get all of my questions answered within a couple of weeks and I am very happy I did it.
4) If your husband decides on a prostatectomy, make sure he gets a robot assisted radical prostatectomy or RARP and not an Open prostatectomy. While research may indicate that the outcomes may be similar, the recovery is much faster RARP.
5) I suggest at least checking into active surveillance as a treatment option, if only to give you comfort that your husbands cancer, based on what you posted and my understanding as a fellow patient only, is likely to progress slowly.

I empathize with you because I found the uncertainty on not being sure what to do and then not being sure when it will be done to be the hardest part.

I wish you and your husband all of the best.

Jump to this post

Your post surgery results look good, I was also a 3+4 after my biopsy and 4+3 after surgery. Still around after 15 years with BRCA2.

I attended a UCSF webinar about Gleason and cribriform issues. If you have large cribriform (over .25mm) that means your cancer is very aggressive even if you only have a Gleason 3+4. Chance of Metastasis with large cribriform is very high. You need to find out if your cribriform is large.

Not sure if you can find this out, You could have it reviewed by another doctor that specializes in prostate cancer biopsy reviews. I know a couple of them if you are interested. Considering the amount of money you spent on doctors this might be even more informative.

I mentioned this because at a PCI conference in March Kwon and Moyad agree to this. Seeds for metastasis were already there when surgery was done, waiting to grow

That explains why so many people are coming back after surgery and needing salvage radiation. I needed it 3 1/2 years after surgery.

Did you get a decipher score so you know how likely it is that you are going to have reoccurrence. You can do it any time

REPLY
Profile picture for jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

I have read about this and this part was quite informative

SBRT is an excellent option for most localized prostate cancers, but for tumors with a cribriform pattern, the risk of recurrence is higher and SBRT may not fully eliminate the cancer. These cases often require more aggressive or combined treatment approaches, and decisions should be made in consultation with a specialist. As a result surgery is recommended for localized cancer.
EBRT is also recommended with a little bit higher dosage than without cribriform.

Jump to this post

This was a small but interesting study. The only one I could find that compared cribiform with and without IDC.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31059665/
The study was too small to be definitive, but hopefully it leads to more studies.
My MO at the University of Cincinnati was the one who got me interested in it. She said when she sees cribiform she looks for 2 things;
- accompanying IDC or
-PTEN loss (on Decipher)
If either are present she treats it much more aggressively.
Obviously she didn't dismiss the need for treatment with cribiform. But she said alone it raises a yellow flag. In conjunction with IDC or PTEN loss, it's a red flag.

It's interesting that historically, IDC (much more aggressive) was lumped with cribiform and it wasn't until 2016 that the WHO recognized them as 2 distinct findings.

It was confusing to me when diagnosed because Dr. Google told me it was basically a death sentence but the none of the doctors I consulted with felt it would change there approach to therapy. The one thing it certainly did was rule out active survellience.

REPLY
Profile picture for markrd @markrd

Hi, based on the research I have done for my prostate cancer diagnosis, I think your Urologist is giving you good advice. With a Gleason score of 3+4 and cancer that is contained to the prostate, active surveillance could be one of the options available. I don't say this to suggest this treatment option, but rather to indicate that from the information you have provided, his form of cancer is not aggressive and not likely to progress significantly in six months or likely even longer.

I am also from Canada (central Alberta). Before having a biopsy, I had a PSMA MRI, which detected a small lesion that extended outside the capsule of the prostate. A subsequent biopsy confirmed that the lesion was cancerous (Gleason 4+3) with Cribriform Pattern 4 present. I had a subsequent PSMA PET Scan that showed no indication of spread. Because my cancer had more aggressive indicators than your husbands (i.e., it extended outside of my prostate capsule, was Gleason 4+3 and had Cribriform pattern), I definitely required treatment and had a robot assisted radical prostatectomy on July 14th. My follow-up pathology showed no cancer in any of the margins of what was removed or in removed lymph nodes and seminal vesicles. This was good news and post surgery pathology is standard testing that they will do if your husband opts for surgery.

A few things to consider:
1) Check if the biopsy results mention anything about Cribriform Pattern, which is a more aggressive form. If it was not found this is a good sign.
2) If your husband had a PSMA MRI test before getting a biopsy, this provides an image of prostate and whether the cancer is confined to the prostate or may have spread to surrounding tissues. I was not sure what you meant by "Contained in both side prostate", but if you meant that the cancer is confined to the prostate this is also a good thing.
3) I did a lot of online research from reputable sites and spoke to two different urologists, but I still wasn't sure I knew enough about the treatment options to be sure that a prostatectomy was the best option for me. I decided to book private consults with a urology surgeon and a radiation oncologist at the Mayo Clinic. It cost me a few thousand dollars US, but I was able to get all of my questions answered within a couple of weeks and I am very happy I did it.
4) If your husband decides on a prostatectomy, make sure he gets a robot assisted radical prostatectomy or RARP and not an Open prostatectomy. While research may indicate that the outcomes may be similar, the recovery is much faster RARP.
5) I suggest at least checking into active surveillance as a treatment option, if only to give you comfort that your husbands cancer, based on what you posted and my understanding as a fellow patient only, is likely to progress slowly.

I empathize with you because I found the uncertainty on not being sure what to do and then not being sure when it will be done to be the hardest part.

I wish you and your husband all of the best.

Jump to this post

Thank you for replying in detail! My husband 68 years old, non diabetic and non hyper tensive, non smoker, has acinar adenocarcinoma stage II. On both sides of prostate but within the prostate. 3 out of 15 cores positive. first core 10% 3, second 15% 3 and the third one 25% consisting of 19% 3 and 6% 4. No cribiform. PSMA pet can and MRI clear except for the prostate. I think there were 3 areas on the prostate, 2 of them less than 5mm and 1 was 10 mm. biopsy done 30th april. surgery may be in Oct. Just wondering if the wait is too long. Surgeon is very experienced wth good ratings. refuses to precribe ADT while waiting 6 months. Can you tell me how long you waited from date of bipsy for surgery and if you were prescribed any medication during the wait? Thank you.

REPLY
Profile picture for bearcat998 @bearcat998

This was a small but interesting study. The only one I could find that compared cribiform with and without IDC.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31059665/
The study was too small to be definitive, but hopefully it leads to more studies.
My MO at the University of Cincinnati was the one who got me interested in it. She said when she sees cribiform she looks for 2 things;
- accompanying IDC or
-PTEN loss (on Decipher)
If either are present she treats it much more aggressively.
Obviously she didn't dismiss the need for treatment with cribiform. But she said alone it raises a yellow flag. In conjunction with IDC or PTEN loss, it's a red flag.

It's interesting that historically, IDC (much more aggressive) was lumped with cribiform and it wasn't until 2016 that the WHO recognized them as 2 distinct findings.

It was confusing to me when diagnosed because Dr. Google told me it was basically a death sentence but the none of the doctors I consulted with felt it would change there approach to therapy. The one thing it certainly did was rule out active survellience.

Jump to this post

At that UCSF conference I went to the size of cribriform was a real critical issue. If over 2.5 mm it meant that the Gleason score had a 5 in it even if it was a 3+4

The doctors also mentioned that if somebody has intraductal they almost certainly have Cribriform. Tying the two together more than what do you seem to have heard?

Sure would be helpful if they could do a study that center on people that had cribriform, to see the long-term impact.

REPLY
Profile picture for shalom7777777 @shalom7777777

Thank you for replying in detail! My husband 68 years old, non diabetic and non hyper tensive, non smoker, has acinar adenocarcinoma stage II. On both sides of prostate but within the prostate. 3 out of 15 cores positive. first core 10% 3, second 15% 3 and the third one 25% consisting of 19% 3 and 6% 4. No cribiform. PSMA pet can and MRI clear except for the prostate. I think there were 3 areas on the prostate, 2 of them less than 5mm and 1 was 10 mm. biopsy done 30th april. surgery may be in Oct. Just wondering if the wait is too long. Surgeon is very experienced wth good ratings. refuses to precribe ADT while waiting 6 months. Can you tell me how long you waited from date of bipsy for surgery and if you were prescribed any medication during the wait? Thank you.

Jump to this post

You need to find a more supportive doctor. Your doctor does not appear to be aware of how six months could be a major factor in someone’s cancer growth if they are not on ADT. Yes, it grows slowly, but not even considering putting him on ADT is a problem.

Did you ever speak to A radiation oncologist, about radiation instead of surgery or even one of the other treatments that work quite well with somebody that has cancer a your husband‘s level. Here are Non radiation treatments your husband could consider HIFU , Cryoabalation , NanoKnife , TULSA PRO, HoLEP.

It sounds like you found a urologist who really isn’t experienced enough for modern treatments. You would be much better off, going to the Mayo Clinic or finding a Genito urinary oncologist, They are the ones that specialize in prostate cancer.

There is no reason your husband should wait six months for treatment.

REPLY
Profile picture for jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

You need to find a more supportive doctor. Your doctor does not appear to be aware of how six months could be a major factor in someone’s cancer growth if they are not on ADT. Yes, it grows slowly, but not even considering putting him on ADT is a problem.

Did you ever speak to A radiation oncologist, about radiation instead of surgery or even one of the other treatments that work quite well with somebody that has cancer a your husband‘s level. Here are Non radiation treatments your husband could consider HIFU , Cryoabalation , NanoKnife , TULSA PRO, HoLEP.

It sounds like you found a urologist who really isn’t experienced enough for modern treatments. You would be much better off, going to the Mayo Clinic or finding a Genito urinary oncologist, They are the ones that specialize in prostate cancer.

There is no reason your husband should wait six months for treatment.

Jump to this post

Thank you so much for your comments. I agree with you that 6 months seems long for going without medication. We have decided on surgery but if we change the doctor we may have to wait longer. Also. the surgeon we have been allocated has a great reputation. Only problem is going without medication in the meantime.

REPLY
Profile picture for shalom7777777 @shalom7777777

Thank you so much for your comments. I agree with you that 6 months seems long for going without medication. We have decided on surgery but if we change the doctor we may have to wait longer. Also. the surgeon we have been allocated has a great reputation. Only problem is going without medication in the meantime.

Jump to this post

You can get a second opinion and go over the options with a different doctor. Six months is a long time to wait for surgery and I know that many people don’t have to wait that long. Insurance Does pay for this.

You may find a different medical team can get you as good or better treatment.

REPLY
Profile picture for shalom7777777 @shalom7777777

Thank you for replying in detail! My husband 68 years old, non diabetic and non hyper tensive, non smoker, has acinar adenocarcinoma stage II. On both sides of prostate but within the prostate. 3 out of 15 cores positive. first core 10% 3, second 15% 3 and the third one 25% consisting of 19% 3 and 6% 4. No cribiform. PSMA pet can and MRI clear except for the prostate. I think there were 3 areas on the prostate, 2 of them less than 5mm and 1 was 10 mm. biopsy done 30th april. surgery may be in Oct. Just wondering if the wait is too long. Surgeon is very experienced wth good ratings. refuses to precribe ADT while waiting 6 months. Can you tell me how long you waited from date of bipsy for surgery and if you were prescribed any medication during the wait? Thank you.

Jump to this post

I really believe that your surgeon is giving you good advice. My surgery was originally scheduled to be six months from my biopsy, like your husband's. I consulted widely before my surgery. I spoke to two Urologists here in Alberta, and I travelled to the Mayo Clinic in Florida to have private consults with another Urologist and a Radiation Oncologist. All agreed that surgery was the best option for me and that waiting six months should not be a concern. And remember, my cancer was significantly more aggressive than your husband's. My cancer had extended outside of the capsule of my prostate, it had Cribriform and was Gleason 4+3.

I remember, when I asked the Radiation Oncologist what he would do in my circumstance, he said that he would opt of surgery over radiation because of the adverse side effects of ADT that would be part of the radiation therapy.

I also asked him if he would opt to pay for surgery out of pocket to get it early and he had a humorous response, but he meant it. He said: No, I would use the money to go on a long cruise and would wait for surgery in six months without worrying about it.

In summary, from the information you provided your husbands cancer does not have aggressive characteristics and from my research and consults, I do not think waiting six months for surgery is too long. In your husbands circumstance, I would not consider taking ADT before surgery. The side effects of ADT are supposed to be very unpleasant.

Finally, make sure your husband is getting the Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy or RARP surgery.

REPLY

Hi everyone, I’m hoping to get some insights or hear from others with similar experiences. I’m currently 8 months into treatment for prostate cancer. My regimen has included:
Firmagon (ADT) since diagnosis (8 months so far)
23 fractions of external beam radiation (EBRT)
1 HDR brachytherapy insertion
Initial PSA was 26.7
Current PSA is 0.47
Testosterone is at castrate levels
Pathology showed cribriform pattern, which I understand can indicate a more aggressive form of cancer
I’ve heard (including from Dr. Mark Scholz) that PSA should ideally be ≤0.1, and preferably closer to 0.01, by this point in therapy. While my drop from 26.7 to 0.47 is substantial, I’m concerned it may not be as low as it should be, especially after combined ADT, EBRT, and HDR. Has anyone experienced a similar slower or plateauing PSA response? Should I be concerned about the possibility of hormone-resistant disease or undertreated cancer?

I would really appreciate any thoughts or experiences you’re willing to share.

REPLY

ADT is unpleasant but to know the cancer has gone to sleep for now is mentally appealing.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.