CA 19-9 and pancreatic cancer: What do the numbers mean?

Posted by lisarlee @lisarlee, Feb 1, 2020

What is your opinion on these numbers? Was diagnosed in September 2019 and my ca 19-9 was 7500. New number yesterday was 909 after 9 chemo sessions. Is this good news or a wasted test?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Pancreatic Cancer Support Group.

My experience has been that CA 9-19 can be affected by benign conditions like gallstones. After recently finishing 12 Folferinox treatments, my CA 9-19 was 411. It was 552 before my distal pancreatectomy, and 74 after surgery. I am stage 1b. I have an appointment today with my oncologist, and I will ask him how definitive the CA 9-19 test is and what can throw it off.

REPLY
@robee

Diagnosed in May of 2022, I have inoperable stage IV (tumor is in tail and involves veins and arteries with tiny spot initially seen in liver) and have had 17 sessions of Folfirinox-sometimes minus ironiteacan and as of recently minus oxiliaplatin. Except for chemo days and the overall reduced stamina, I feel healthy and keep myself busy and have no other health issues. Pet scans and CT scans which initially showed shrinkage (tumor is very small and no longer is there evidence detectable in liver) currently shows "stable". However, my CA19-9 is slowly creeping upwards-highest was 2558 and dropped to 65 in Nov of 2022, but now is 402. Should i be more worried than the oncologist lets on?? I am not at a pancreatic cancer center for oncology but have been advocating for myself with info I find on medical sites at JH, Mayo, and MSK. I will be traveling to MSK to receive MRI guided SBRT next month. I often feel I am only given standard treatment locally unless I present other options–it is so frustrating. Any advice/suggestions would be helpful.

Jump to this post

I think going to MSK & or Mayo will give you all the answers you need .I have heard they don't believe the CA-19 is full proof .Go get second & third opinion.!♥️🙏

REPLY
@colleenyoung

I like the information provided by the website Lab Tests Online (https://labtestsonline.org/) by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC). The information is trustworthy and easy to understand.

Here's the page about Cancer Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) https://labtestsonline.org/tests/cancer-antigen-19-9
CA 19-9 is primarily used to monitor response to pancreatic cancer treatment and to watch for recurrence. In the section called "What does the test result mean?" it states:
"Levels of CA 19-9 that are initially high and then fall over time may indicate that the treatment is working and/or that the cancer was removed successfully during surgery. Levels that remain high or rise over time may indicate that treatment is not working and/or that the cancer is recurring."

@lisarlee, I understand that your step daughter may not have complete faith in the CA 19-9 test. It is only one test. But taking a blood sample is a simple, non-invasive test to keep check on things. Your cancer team will use multiple tests in addition to the CA 19-9 test to monitor the cancer, how the treatment is working or not, and watch for signs of recurrence.

For the moment, I think both you and @colorafo19 can accept the lower numbers as good news and have confidence in the teams monitor of the cancer. What other tests have you had? How are you feeling?

Jump to this post

Diagnosed in May of 2022, I have inoperable stage IV (tumor is in tail and involves veins and arteries with tiny spot initially seen in liver) and have had 17 sessions of Folfirinox-sometimes minus ironiteacan and as of recently minus oxiliaplatin. Except for chemo days and the overall reduced stamina, I feel healthy and keep myself busy and have no other health issues. Pet scans and CT scans which initially showed shrinkage (tumor is very small and no longer is there evidence detectable in liver) currently shows "stable". However, my CA19-9 is slowly creeping upwards-highest was 2558 and dropped to 65 in Nov of 2022, but now is 402. Should i be more worried than the oncologist lets on?? I am not at a pancreatic cancer center for oncology but have been advocating for myself with info I find on medical sites at JH, Mayo, and MSK. I will be traveling to MSK to receive MRI guided SBRT next month. I often feel I am only given standard treatment locally unless I present other options–it is so frustrating. Any advice/suggestions would be helpful.

REPLY
@stuartg123

I have recently diagnosed advanced neuroendocrine pancreatic cancer (mass in tail, locally spread and mets to liver and distal esophagus). Completed first course of high dose chemo. 3 weeks later, Ca-19-9 has gone from 23,000 to 43,000. Is chemo a failure? Should I start second course?
Thanks

Jump to this post

When chemo is first started, the tumor burden is large. That means there is malignancy with a lot of surface area for chemotherapy and radiation to have contact with. And that equates with a lot of available CA19-9 being released into the circulation. A rise is not uncommon for several sessions and is a frequent observation. As the tumor shrinks, the surface area is reduced as there are less cells available to release CA19-9.

ThemCA19-9 is used between scans to get a general picture of what is going on. Early measurements don’t necessarily reflect whether the chemo is effective.And with radiation, it’s effects linger for weeks afterward in causing cell death. This is why oncologists usually don’t order CA19-9 testing during and after radiation treatment for several weeks following.

A CT or MRI is the definitive method oncologists use to determine chemotherapy effectiveness. A current scan is compared to the prior scan by measuring the diameter of the tumor(s).They look for shrinkage, stability or increase in size and make adjustments accordingly.

CA19-9 Treatment and Effectiveness

The link below is to a scientific publication that elaborates further.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294221000952
REPLY

I have recently diagnosed advanced neuroendocrine pancreatic cancer (mass in tail, locally spread and mets to liver and distal esophagus). Completed first course of high dose chemo. 3 weeks later, Ca-19-9 has gone from 23,000 to 43,000. Is chemo a failure? Should I start second course?
Thanks

REPLY

Very helpful, we are in a similar situation with my husband and will look into this!

REPLY
@jqleck

Opinion...on the numbers. That is very well put for this question. From my reading over the last several months it is a "marker", not really used to direct actionable treatment decisions. What I mean by that is the number is from our experience so far the Oncologist (team) use it to see if the chemo is impacting the cancer. If it is remarkable they order more definitive test to validate "impressions". For my wife it was ...2291 start and after three rounds of the 5FU, Oxipltn and several enhancers her CA 19-9 is 80. Just had the blood work today to see what the last rounds results are. As for now she is stopping chemo. Her digestive system is destroyed. she cannot eat or hold ANY food down. Her bowls are releasing water seven or eight times a day. She is getting hydration and has now been put on intravenous nutrition (TPN). As of now I do not believe she will be able to have any more chemo, it is just too much for her to take. I pressed the Oncology team for weeks about her side effects being EXTREME. They simply gave her another nausea med and a different diarrhea med and sent her to tough it out. Finally today, I got their attention and said she will not be here monday for her next infusion...she cannot take it. They ordered an x-ray and again sent us on our way. So sad to watch my beautiful wife being destroyed by this.

Jump to this post

@jqleck Your wife's situation has parallels to my wife. 3 years into treatment my wife started as a robust, healthy athletic woman who is now frail and largely bedridden. The problem? Getting useful medical advice in dealing with chemo caused destruction of the digestive system. We tried every protein supplement on the planet and none of them do a thing for the patient who can't digest and absorb the nutrients. We just recently discovered another approach and are 3 weeks in. The product, Enterade is an electrolyte and amino acid blend that is designed to heal the cilia cells in the GI tract so that food intake can be properly absorbed. We don't have any financial stake in the company, and it could turn out to be a waste of money but we're giving it a try. Nothing else prescribed by the doctors or suggested by the nutritionists has helped. Since starting the Enterade she's had some good days without diarrhea. It's not consistent but we didn't expect instant relief considering that she's had 3 years of destruction and is still getting irinotican every other week. (Irinotican also called I ran to the can). Keep in touch if you try Enterade and it helps. Good luck.

REPLY
@jqleck

Opinion...on the numbers. That is very well put for this question. From my reading over the last several months it is a "marker", not really used to direct actionable treatment decisions. What I mean by that is the number is from our experience so far the Oncologist (team) use it to see if the chemo is impacting the cancer. If it is remarkable they order more definitive test to validate "impressions". For my wife it was ...2291 start and after three rounds of the 5FU, Oxipltn and several enhancers her CA 19-9 is 80. Just had the blood work today to see what the last rounds results are. As for now she is stopping chemo. Her digestive system is destroyed. she cannot eat or hold ANY food down. Her bowls are releasing water seven or eight times a day. She is getting hydration and has now been put on intravenous nutrition (TPN). As of now I do not believe she will be able to have any more chemo, it is just too much for her to take. I pressed the Oncology team for weeks about her side effects being EXTREME. They simply gave her another nausea med and a different diarrhea med and sent her to tough it out. Finally today, I got their attention and said she will not be here monday for her next infusion...she cannot take it. They ordered an x-ray and again sent us on our way. So sad to watch my beautiful wife being destroyed by this.

Jump to this post

To touch on a couple of points you mention-
I suffered fro chronic diarrhea all through my chemo. Imodium was not effective for me so the care team prescribed Lomax, Lomatil or their generic form diphenoxylate atropine which were effective. I did not wait until symptoms manifested. I used the anti-diarrheal products proactively generally taking 36 hours in advance. That worked well for me. But a contributing cause of the diarrhea was not so much the chemo but that I was exhibiting all the classic signs of Exocrine Pancreas Insufficiency (EPI). I was never prescribed Pancreas Enzyme Replacement Therapy (PERT) after the Whipple and how I suffered and struggled with malabsorption p, malnutrition, dehydration. After doing some research and having reported my symptoms at every exam with them being noted but not addressed, I asked for an Rex for Creon. That turned things around and my QoL dramatically improved.

CA19-9 is not a perfect marker. It is used for PadAC tumors but is not present in PACC or PNET tumors and there is a small percentage of patients who due tone genetics are non-secretors. CA19-9 is a “relative” number. What I mean by that is what one person may consider high (e.g., 400) because it is over the upper normal limit of 37U/mL, could be considered low when compared to a patient of 818,000. In the early stages of treatment, CA19-9 measurements may show an increase giving the false impression the chemo regimen is not effective. It is well documented that when starting off with a high tumor burden, there is more surface area for the tumor to come in contact with and there is more CA19-9 available for release as those cells die. As the tumor burden decreases (shrinks) as the chemo works, there is less surface area and less CA19-9 that can be released with less cells.

The definitive measurement for chemo efficacy is doing a CT or MRI at 3 month intervals. A current scan is compared to the previous scan to determine percent shrinkage or if the disease is stable. It is possible to have elevated levels of CA19-9 yet the tumors shrinking from inflammatory effects of the chemo on CA19-9 and there are documented benign conditions where elevated CA19-9 occur. That is why oncologists use imaging as the definitive method to assess chemo effectiveness.

CAUSES OF CA19-9 ELEVATION IN NON-CANCEROUS CONDITIONS

Non-cancerous conditions that can cause high CA 19-9 levels include:
* Gallstones
* Biliary infection (cholangitis)
* Blockage of the bile duct (jaundice)
* Pancreatitis (swelling of the pancreas)
* Cystic fibrosis
* Liver disease

During radiation therapy, CA 19-9 levels might be raised as dying cancer cells release CA 19-9. For this reason, the test is not usually done while the patient receives radiation treatment.

REPLY

Opinion...on the numbers. That is very well put for this question. From my reading over the last several months it is a "marker", not really used to direct actionable treatment decisions. What I mean by that is the number is from our experience so far the Oncologist (team) use it to see if the chemo is impacting the cancer. If it is remarkable they order more definitive test to validate "impressions". For my wife it was ...2291 start and after three rounds of the 5FU, Oxipltn and several enhancers her CA 19-9 is 80. Just had the blood work today to see what the last rounds results are. As for now she is stopping chemo. Her digestive system is destroyed. she cannot eat or hold ANY food down. Her bowls are releasing water seven or eight times a day. She is getting hydration and has now been put on intravenous nutrition (TPN). As of now I do not believe she will be able to have any more chemo, it is just too much for her to take. I pressed the Oncology team for weeks about her side effects being EXTREME. They simply gave her another nausea med and a different diarrhea med and sent her to tough it out. Finally today, I got their attention and said she will not be here monday for her next infusion...she cannot take it. They ordered an x-ray and again sent us on our way. So sad to watch my beautiful wife being destroyed by this.

REPLY
@maui

Which combo helped the most?

Jump to this post

In my wife's case, the combinations which included platinum (oxalyplaten with folfirinox: cisplaten with gemcitibine/abraxane) were the most effective, but also the most debilitating side effects.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.