Aromatase Inhibitors: Did you decide to go on them or not?
Nanaloves: I’m about to start arimidex and just feel that the contraindications , bone issues etc. are overwhelming. I’m 70 years old, dodged a bullet I feel with zero stage DCIS but the follow up is pretty much no different then if it was more aggressive. I’ve just done 33 treatments of radiation and now they advise arimidex as a preventative. I’m not sure with the beginnings of arthritis and lower back. sensitivity already that I should take it. Anyone not take it and not have a recurrence within the 5 years.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Breast Cancer Support Group.
Americans take ten times more prescription drugs then other Industrialized countries. The medicine I was taking, Anastrozole, gave me bad side effects, after being on the medicine for more then 2 months. It made me so irritable and mean it would have destroyed my marriage and my relationships with family and children. This POST is probably the effects of the Anastrozole still in my system. It was affecting my mental health that I started to drink alcohol, eat tons of carbs, and sugar. I was gaining weight and felt depressed. They offered anti-depressants or mood stabilizers, to combat the side effects. I have never been on anti-depressants. America has 5 percent of the worlds population but uses 60 percent of the worlds anti-depressant medicine. When I went off this medicine I feel like a million dollars, stopped drinking alcohol, started eating healthy, etc.. Maybe, in my case, the Anastrozole is doing more harm then good? I will try another estrogen blocking drug but this would be my 3rd drug. Most important I trust my doctor and team at Mayo.
@pbnew and others, you might be interested in this past webinar.
– Video Q&A Cancer-Fighting Foods https://connect.mayoclinic.org/webinar/cancer-fighting-foods/
@muradangie would you mind posting links to free webinars or classes (past and future) related to cancer and nutrition offered by Mayo?
I have read of teeth falling out, as well as dental implants becoming 'unincorporated' in the jaw as a result of BRONJ (bisphosphonate related ostenecrosis of the jaw) and a friend on Zometa was told that she should take it for no more than 3 years 'to be safe.' The jawbone doesn't just die, it loses blood supply, ergo the risk of any oral surgeries that leave tissue that needs to heal is that cannot in the absence of blood supply. And infections in open remaining tissue are extremely difficult to treat as there's inadequate blood supply to carry antibiotics to the site.
I have a great prosthodontist (and two dental implants) who's had to decline patients on some of the osteoporosis drugs because of the difficulties. He knows of no others who are willing to treat patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw (which one oncologist whose opinion I read thinks is a misnomer and that the condition 'looks more like osteomyelitis' to him).
Dr. S. told me how difficult it is for BRONJ victims to get help and it's a condition devoutly to be avoided in any way possible in my opinion. And caused me to improve diet and get back to the gym in hopes if keeping osteoporosis far away.
What your mother has endured is awful. I think that, were she being treated for osteoporosis today, for the first time, the outlook would be more promising.
Fosamax, the first bisphosphonate if I recall correctly was never designed to be given for multiple decades. In fact Merck has consistently declined to design a long-term study of its efficacy and safety. (My career included researching corporations for a Wall Street investment manager. My cynicism was hard-earned and I suspect that Merck prefers to maintain plausible deniabality as the long-term adverse effects lawsuits pile up. And that corporate counsel suggest they not ask 'inconvenient' questions but no one need share my dim view.]
Fosamax was intended to be marketed to women in their early-to-mid 70s at a time when the life expectancy would suggest they'd be on it for a decade at best on average. [Note that now it's being marketed to ever younger women and I wonder why the FDA is silent about that mission creep.]
We've outlived a lot of drugs' usefulness, ironically enough, and that is good news.
I think it's all a balancing act and some people will be, as you are, more proactive in trying to improve the variables under their control and, just maybe, need way fewer pharmaceuticals. And be less willing to take them without some serious pondering of the risk/reward balance. That's good news too ;-).
I've never heard that so have no opinion other than wonder if that is true today, after OnctotypeDX has been offering the DX test for several years now.
I would add one thing. A lot of women with breast cancer take both chemo and aromatase inhibitors. They are not substitutes for each other, though some oncologists only recommend the AIs for what they evaluate as low recurrence- rate risk cancers.
Would you post a link from the education center specifically on nutrition? The link you posted led me to the nutrition specialist service which did not appear to be free.
I agree with you! No one in this process even mentions nutrition. I highly recommend
drjohnmcdougall.com for great info on nutrition and cancer.
Our Cancer Education Center is open Monday-Friday 8-5 pm. If you have questions about any of our classes our Center's number is 507-266-9288.