Are castration sensitive prostate cancer patients being over treated?

Posted by jeff Marchi @jeffmarc, Jan 31 8:31pm

Ancan.Org had a meeting with doctors from the National Cancer Institute to discuss over treatment of patients that had BCR (biochemically, recurrent prostate cancer). They discussed a lot of the reasons why patients are being over treated today, when their PSA starts to rise or a PSMA pet test shows faint possibilities..

One interesting thing was, they say that people with CSPC shouldn’t start counting the doubling rate until their PSA hits .5 or even 1.

This meeting was instigated by the following article

https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO-25-01693

Here is the video from Ancan’s meeting with the doctors to discuss over treating patients due to PSMA pet testing and other test results, referred to as PSMA+BCR.

Here is a link to the video conference

https://ancan.us14.list-manage.com/track/click

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for smoore4 @smoore4

Yes, this is true for the typical "slow growing" prostates cancers, but it is not for aggressive ones. That's why Decipher and genetic tests are so important. Gotta know what you have. Taking your time with a aggressiv PCa is an error imo.

Jump to this post

@smoore4 You mentioned genetic tests Our radiation oncologist did not do a genetics test. I asked him about it and he said that was because my husband's father developed prostate cancer when he was in his 60's. Therefore, genetics wouldn't apply. I think I have read that genes mutate and change . Does anyone know about this?

REPLY

You mentioned genetic tests Our radiation oncologist did not do a genetics test. I asked him about it and he said that was because my husband's father developed prostate cancer when he was in his 60's. Therefore, genetics wouldn't apply. I think I have read that genes mutate and change . Does anyone know about this?

REPLY
Profile picture for fbuckwalter @fbuckwalter

Where do I go to find all the accornyms and how to understand what is going on with you. I have had a prostatectomy and radiation. My PSA keeps creeping up and I have done androgen therapy twice. I would like to see and understanding what others are doing.

Anyone have experiences from the use of AI?

Jump to this post

@fbuckwalter
Here is a list

Shared files

PC Abbreviations (PC-Abbreviations-.pdf)

REPLY
Profile picture for gkgdawg @gkgdawg

@smoore4 You mentioned genetic tests Our radiation oncologist did not do a genetics test. I asked him about it and he said that was because my husband's father developed prostate cancer when he was in his 60's. Therefore, genetics wouldn't apply. I think I have read that genes mutate and change . Does anyone know about this?

Jump to this post

@gkgdawg
That is one of the most absurd statements I’ve ever heard of As an excuse for not Doing genetic testing.. Having prostate cancer, that young can be directly caused by a genetic problem. I had it at 62 because I have BRCA2 Which I got from my mother. My brother got it at 77 because he doesn’t have BRCA2, but our father died of prostate cancer, which doubles the chance.

That doctor was incompetent when it comes to Understanding, genetic testing.

REPLY
Profile picture for jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@jeffmarc I checked the pdf you linked to for the most recent acronym that I had to look up and that is MDT. MDT stands for Metastasis-Directed Therapy and needs to be added to that otherwise excellent list.

REPLY
Profile picture for fbuckwalter @fbuckwalter

Where do I go to find all the accornyms and how to understand what is going on with you. I have had a prostatectomy and radiation. My PSA keeps creeping up and I have done androgen therapy twice. I would like to see and understanding what others are doing.

Anyone have experiences from the use of AI?

Jump to this post

@fbuckwalter , welcome. You're right that there are a ton of acronyms to learn with cancer diagnosis. The guys have built a list here:
- Prostate cancer-related abbreviations: What acronym would you add?https://connect.mayoclinic.org/discussion/prostate-cancer-related-abbreviations-what-acronym-would-you-add/

As for using AI to search for information and decision making for health, it's top priority to fact check. AI tools do not replace human judgment or oversight. Any text, image, or video generated by AI should be used only as a starting point, not as verified information. It may contain inaccuracies, biases, and other problems. Generative AI tools can sometimes generate plausible-sounding answers that are wrong.

Here's some sound advice about using AI
- What is Generative AI? What does this mean on Mayo Clinic Connect? https://connect.mayoclinic.org/blog/about-connect/newsfeed-post/what-is-generative-ai-artificial-intelligence-what-does-this-mean-on-mayo-clinic-connect/

fbuckwalter, Is your oncologist suggesting another androgen therapy with the rising PSA? What are next steps?

REPLY
Profile picture for gkgdawg @gkgdawg

You mentioned genetic tests Our radiation oncologist did not do a genetics test. I asked him about it and he said that was because my husband's father developed prostate cancer when he was in his 60's. Therefore, genetics wouldn't apply. I think I have read that genes mutate and change . Does anyone know about this?

Jump to this post

@gkgdawg Makes ZERO sense.

REPLY
Profile picture for heavyphil @heavyphil

@gkgdawg Makes ZERO sense.

Jump to this post

@heavyphil So, you agree with me? Genetic testing should be part of his tratment?

REPLY
Profile picture for gkgdawg @gkgdawg

You mentioned genetic tests Our radiation oncologist did not do a genetics test. I asked him about it and he said that was because my husband's father developed prostate cancer when he was in his 60's. Therefore, genetics wouldn't apply. I think I have read that genes mutate and change . Does anyone know about this?

Jump to this post

@gkgdawg
Technically speaking what the issue would be is that genes are selected and omitted. So the likelihood of bad genes is higher (if never actually checked in your father) that he had a bad gene (or two ...), and the possibility is there that if he had a bad gene it (they) was passed onto you, but the only way to be certain is to test you.

Now the doctor may have treatment guidelines on all this so it's not entirely his decision and the genetics test costs whatever it costs but isn't too cheap, and that's what that is. So no matter how high the odds, the only way to be certain is to run the test. You're not a number you're an individual. And more and more medicine is guided for solid scientific reasons on genetics.

At worst it confirms what he's already assuming.

But at best it's a new guideline that might save you from over-treatment - and even save the insurance company some money!

REPLY
Profile picture for gkgdawg @gkgdawg

@heavyphil So, you agree with me? Genetic testing should be part of his tratment?

Jump to this post

@gkgdawg I was disagreeing with your oncologist’s statement that a genetics test does not apply to him because his father developed PCa in his 60’s. Genetics is the basis (IMO) for prostate cancer so knowledge is power, treatment-wise.
However, if your husband has a relatively lower Gleason score, Decipher test, negative PSMA, etc., your doctor may simply mean that it is not necessary since treatment will unfold along fairly standard lines; in other words, nothing dire or of
Significance.
Phil

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.