1. < Prostate Cancer

Active Surveillance As A Choice?

Posted by desertfalcon1954 @desertfalcon1954, Mar 11 8:13pm

This is very good news. Most men with localised prostate cancer are likely to live for a long time, whether or not they receive invasive treatment and whether or not their disease has spread, so a quick decision for treatment is not necessary and could cause harm.
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2023-03-13-study-shows-delaying-treatment-localised-prostate-cancer-does-not-increase-mortality

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

airborn | @airborn | Jun 16 2:37pm
In reply to @mn281 "I'm always skeptical about data like these when they indicate that around 75% of the men..." + (show)
@mn281

I'm always skeptical about data like these when they indicate that around 75% of the men on active surveillance had some type of treatment within the 15 year study period. Was it that treatment that influenced the success rate to a higher degree? Hard to tell when only "around 15%" of the men stayed on AS the whole time. I agree a quick decision is not always needed, but IMO a decision at some point is necessary.

Jump to this post

A decision regarding what? To decide to treat?
Even if the 3tMRI was stable with no changes, and PSA was stable?
In this case the decision should remain AS.

REPLY
View MoreView Less
Please sign in or register to post a reply.