← Return to What is the current position on the length of hormone treatment?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@retireddoc

Thank you for your reply.

Regarding "complete faith", I said "I choose my physicians wisely and have complete faith in them". The key here choosing wisely. Having been in the medical profession for over 40 years, I can attest that physicians are no different than people in any other field or endeavor in life. Some are brilliant, experienced, dedicated and highly skilled. Others not so much. No different in some ways than auto mechanics. I have had some that diagnosed and fixed my problem without difficulty and charges a reasonable fee. Others were more interested in making money than in solving the problem.

I have read some of your posts and you appear to be the exception. You are obviously intelligent and highly invested in your care. You have extensively researched the disease, treatments and physicians. This is not the norm. Most people don't have the understanding to go to the literature and make sense of this complicated disease. This is not a criticism of them. If I tried to go research patent law I would end up confused and likely make the wrong assumptions.

My expert MO at JH and RO at Emory are both highly experienced, knowledgeable and have done extensive research on the topic of prostate cancer. There is no way I could read literature and understand the disease and treatment to the degree that they do. That doesn't mean I don't ask questions or am not involved with my care. My MO at Hopkins, after my chemo, gave me 5 options going forward. He said at this time they is no true SOC with the rapidly changing landscape. One of the options he said he would not recommend. I asked him what he would recommend/do given the risk/benefit. He told me and I followed his advise.

I have always thought that if you don't want to follow your doctor's advice you probably picked the wrong physician. Just my opinion.

Jump to this post


Replies to "Thank you for your reply. Regarding "complete faith", I said "I choose my physicians wisely and..."

I think that both of you are makng the same, or very consistent, comments and observations.
I, for one, appreciate them.
Thank you.

Thanx, makes sense.

My original urologist who did the surgery was very good at that, it was even it came back that he was off. He told me at our last consult before his retirement that it was not often he learned from his patients, I was one of those.

I don't doubt the training, education and experience of any who have been part of my medical team. It's the ability to actively listen, willingness to share with the patient in decision making that has separated the good from the excellent.

I feel you have to have a medical team that matches your patient style. For some, simply doing what the medical team says is good enough, they don't want to or can't wade through all the literature, and if so, great, it's generally not that they're wrong, I'm just not into SOC which I consider as population based using historical data.

I make sure my medical team understands I cannot match their training, education and experience. There is no way I know technical what my radiologist has taken years to master but I grasp the concepts and principles enough to have an intelligent conversation with her.

I appreciate you expounding on your comments, perhaps I took the comment of "in good faith" out of the context which you meant.

Kevin

For those that had treatment that follows the ARSENS trial (i.e., ADT, Darolutamide, and 6 Cycles of Docetaxel). The newest data released by the ARSENS trial.

Overall Survival - Still Not Reached (NR)
Time to Castrate Resistance - Still Not Reached (NR)

It has been 5+ years now. This is promising news.