How important is rising Ca19-9 if CT is stable re: having surgery?
I was diagnosed with stage 1 pan can September 2023. Tumor was 1.8 cm in the neck. I took 2 cycles of Gemzar/ Abraxane in Oct and Nov. After the second cycle, CT showed the tumor had decreased to 1 cm and Ca 19-9 had dropped from 700 to 300.
However, the chemo caused an irregular heartbeat, multiple PVC’s and bronchial pneumonia and pneumonitis. Ten days after my second cycle, I was hospitalized at Moffitt Cancer Center for 5 nights and required a nasal cannula for my oxygen levels. The pneumonitis was resolved with steroids. My surgical oncologist told me to stay off the chemo and I saw him on Dec. 20. Another CT done the day before showed the tumor was .9 cm but the tumor marker had risen to 1400. So on 12/22 a diagnostic laparoscopy was done. Direct visualization did not show any evidence of tumor. Two abdominal biopsies were done along with peritoneal washings.
I was told if everything came back negative, surgery would be done. Also, my surgical oncologist informed me he was leaving Moffitt in Feb and his last surgery he would do would be Jan 12, 2024.
Fortunately, I found out yesterday the test results were negative.
But since the tumor marker was so high on Dec 20, I am now scheduled for a repeat PET scan on 1/2 (I had a negative PET done Oct 2023) and they will repeat the Ca 19-9 as well. Then they want to restart the chemo, maybe Folfironox,( which I understand is even harder to tolerate), and talk about surgery in the spring.
I reminded them of the adverse effects the prior chemo had on me and I didn’t want to miss my window to have an opportunity for surgery.
I have an appointment 1/3 to discuss the next PET and Ca 19-9 results with the medical and surgical oncologist.
My concern as the surgeon is leaving soon is that may affect his attitude regarding doing the surgery. I have worked hard since I was hospitalized to get strong and I have been walking 45 -60 minutes most days, eating well and juicing. So I feel physically ready for surgery and am fearful restarting chemo first will have a similar outcome as the previous regime. Or worse.
Also, I have fortunately been asymptomatic since my diagnosis.
Their rationale to do more chemo is due to the high tumor marker level, even if this next PET is negative.
I feel very strongly that we need to proceed to surgery should this next PET still be negative. But am I missing the larger picture by not being receptive to restarting chemo first?
Any feedback prior to my meeting with my oncologists next week would be greatly appreciated, thank you!
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Pancreatic Cancer Support Group.
Happy New Year to you as well. Thank you for sharing your journey and inspiring words. Sounds like you are doing OK. Wishes for a total recovery for us both!
What type of surgery did you have ?Did you have chemo first and if so, for how long?
I had Whipple surgery prior to having chemo. After 6 week recovery from surgery, had 6 months of gemcitabine/
abraxane chemo.
@mbcfl I did folfurinox for a year before pancreadectomy and liver resection. Was NED for about 6 months then went on GEMZAR in July prior to surgery in October. I’m back on it through January. The doctor doesn’t know but I am taking February off to help with my first grandchild on the way! I am committing this month to studying what could be next for my situation (KRAS G12-D mutation) trying to keep things stable. Everyone’s situation is so different I know!