Just found out I have prostate cancer...

Posted by jeb0505 @jeb0505, Sep 12, 2023

I'm 51, and for the past 2 years, i've been getting my PSA levels checked about every 6 months. In December 2021, my PSA numbers were 'elevated' so the doc took notice (i tested at 4.7, the doc said it should be around 3.5). So i tested again in Feb, 2022 and the number had dropped to 4.3. Great news, i thought, so we tested again in July, 2022, and the level was a calming 3.6. Next test, in December 2022, was 4.1... then, out of nowhere (June, 2023), i found myself at 6.6 and have since been more and more concerned that this might be cancer. Prostate exam suggested that it was possible, followed by an ultrasound that was 'inconclusive'... followed by one of the most unpleasant experiences of my 51 years... the biopsy (the recovery was worse than the procedure by far).

I got my results last week, showing adenocarcinoma in the right lateral base (60%) and the right lateral mid (1%) both having a gleason score of 3+3=6.

Though my results are that i am in a Gleason grade 1, which i have learned is the most favorable, it's still VERY concerning for me... Especially considering i'm barely into my 50's.

There is so much information on the internet, not all of it great, so i've been trying my best to get accurate information from reliable sources, which is what brought me to the Mayo.

I've decided to do nothing for now (Watchful waiting/Active Surveillance; getting PSA tests every 3 months)... I'm curious if others would agree with this approach.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

I did nothing in 2017 when diagnosed with a Gleason 6. I am now 57. In 2013 I had a small lesion on one side of my prostate which the biopsy showed was a Gleason 7. I did a HIFU procedure a couple of weeks ago and have no erectile or contenance issues. I still have Gleason 6 on the other side of my prostate. I am scheduled for a December PSA followed by a March PSA and MRI to see how effective the HIFU was. my doctor told me I did not need a biopsy every other year, and that the biopsy will just drive you to the MRI. I did have another targeted biopsy after the lesion appeared which was as much fun as the first one.

REPLY

I was not diagnosed till was 64. My PSA was 4.7 and actually went down to 3.8 before treatment. You plan sounds good but evert three months seems excessive. Seems like your only other option is Lupron to lower your testosterone levels.

REPLY

Everyone is different. I’m 74 and chose to have RLP. When it was determined I had cancer in me, I wanted it out. Period. Three months post surgery at Mayo Jax. Incontinence decreasing daily. 1st PSA post surgery 10/19. Expecting good results. Talked to a friend yesterday who chose radiology who had lower PSA and Gleason than I and his 1st three-month PSA was 2.0. Ugh! We each have to balance, then decide what we are willing to endure to live longer. I know that at some point, I will have to make a call. My thinking right now is that I don’t want to live live poorly just to live longer. I believe that I will live forever, and that the life to come is better than this one.

REPLY
@donaldguy

Everyone is different. I’m 74 and chose to have RLP. When it was determined I had cancer in me, I wanted it out. Period. Three months post surgery at Mayo Jax. Incontinence decreasing daily. 1st PSA post surgery 10/19. Expecting good results. Talked to a friend yesterday who chose radiology who had lower PSA and Gleason than I and his 1st three-month PSA was 2.0. Ugh! We each have to balance, then decide what we are willing to endure to live longer. I know that at some point, I will have to make a call. My thinking right now is that I don’t want to live live poorly just to live longer. I believe that I will live forever, and that the life to come is better than this one.

Jump to this post

Please clarify first PSA post surgery of 10/19. I have never seen that method of reporting one's PSA. Normal reading would be < .008 or < .010

REPLY
@gkm

Please clarify first PSA post surgery of 10/19. I have never seen that method of reporting one's PSA. Normal reading would be < .008 or < .010

Jump to this post

10/19 refers to the date of my post PSA, not the results. Sorry for the sentence fragments.

REPLY
@pieperfarm

I did nothing in 2017 when diagnosed with a Gleason 6. I am now 57. In 2013 I had a small lesion on one side of my prostate which the biopsy showed was a Gleason 7. I did a HIFU procedure a couple of weeks ago and have no erectile or contenance issues. I still have Gleason 6 on the other side of my prostate. I am scheduled for a December PSA followed by a March PSA and MRI to see how effective the HIFU was. my doctor told me I did not need a biopsy every other year, and that the biopsy will just drive you to the MRI. I did have another targeted biopsy after the lesion appeared which was as much fun as the first one.

Jump to this post

As much fun as the first one. LOL I am glad you have not lost your sense of humor. My first and only was a 30 core transperineally one and it was a real blast too. Dr. Frendle at Mayo Phoenix did a real good job of numbing me up and I can't say enough about him.

REPLY
@donaldguy

Everyone is different. I’m 74 and chose to have RLP. When it was determined I had cancer in me, I wanted it out. Period. Three months post surgery at Mayo Jax. Incontinence decreasing daily. 1st PSA post surgery 10/19. Expecting good results. Talked to a friend yesterday who chose radiology who had lower PSA and Gleason than I and his 1st three-month PSA was 2.0. Ugh! We each have to balance, then decide what we are willing to endure to live longer. I know that at some point, I will have to make a call. My thinking right now is that I don’t want to live live poorly just to live longer. I believe that I will live forever, and that the life to come is better than this one.

Jump to this post

I have seen studies that show almost no difference in life expectancy of 15 years for prostate cancer if you do nothing, have an RP, or radiation. If you are 74 and get 15 years that puts you at 89. Almost sounds like you are looking forward to living in a nursing home. I went with the radiation because I am your age but looking at the obits we are still older than many in the news that are dead way younger than us. I say all the time that no one gets off this rock alive. Good luck and as Spock said "Live long and prosper".

REPLY
@mikewo

I have seen studies that show almost no difference in life expectancy of 15 years for prostate cancer if you do nothing, have an RP, or radiation. If you are 74 and get 15 years that puts you at 89. Almost sounds like you are looking forward to living in a nursing home. I went with the radiation because I am your age but looking at the obits we are still older than many in the news that are dead way younger than us. I say all the time that no one gets off this rock alive. Good luck and as Spock said "Live long and prosper".

Jump to this post

Best wishes with your treatment! I agree with you. Make the call with which you are most comfortable and that is medically reasonable, then live your life. Three months post RLP I am basically fully continent and have had no other side effects. I feel blessed!

I had a parent die in a nursing home at 95. Even with a private sitter for years, before and during the nursing home confinement, I wouldn’t wish those final years on any family. Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.

I’m headed to my farm today to spray some weeds, pressure wash my cabin, and continue prep to burn some planted pines. Feeling fortunate for the life God has given me so far and ready to live more of it! Best to you!

REPLY

Mikewo, do the studies that you mention differentiate between regular PC and CR cancer or Gleason 9 and Gleason 7 or young cancer at 60 or cancer at 70. Perhaps the different shades of PC make a difference as to the aggressiveness of proper treatment, We all want a quality of life for as long as possible so I am interested in the details of the studies that you mentioned

REPLY
@hammer101

I was in a similar situation, but had a GS or 7 (4/3). I was 56 (healthy, active, positive life attitude, etc.) last year and was shocked when diagnosed with prostate cancer. For me, I disagree with watchfully waiting for the cancer to grow and potentially metastasize. I always use the analogy of standing on a train track and seeing a train coming a mile down the tracks - Why not get off the tracks prior to the train getting closer? Your cancer is probably contained presently, and to wait for it to grow and potentially spread seems risky to me. However, I am someone that is focused on wanting/praying for 30+ more years of cancer free life and I am not concerned with short term pain or inconvenience to possibly rid myself of the cancer that was growing within me. I went with the most aggressive treatment form - Radical prostatectomy that allowed for post operation pathology of prostate, seminal vesicles and nine removed lymph nodes. Thankfully all were clear - This does not guarantee cancer free life, but is a positive indicator.

If you decide to address your cancer, please do your research and go to a center of excellence and pick a doctor that is the best you can find. I went to Mayo-Rochester. Excellent experience!!

Best of luck with your decision,

Jim

Jump to this post

Thank you, Jim. For me, i dont fret the short-term pain and inconvenience that a procedure would give me... i worry about potential side effects like ED or incontinence. That, to me, would be worse that waiting. Ugh... tough to know what to do.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.