← Return to Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): Anyone else?

Discussion

Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): Anyone else?

Breast Cancer | Last Active: Mar 24 10:10am | Replies (223)

Comment receiving replies
@semurrey

Hi everyone -
I'm confused as I (57 yrs) recently finished radiation (invasive Lobular -2cm , grade 2 ILC, strongly ER+, PR+, HER2 neg, 0/1 SN) after lumpectomy . My onco was 14 so skipped chemo, and started Letrozole. I saw NP at Dana Farber yesterday for 6 month follow up and she scheduled a diagnostic mammo for Oct (year after initial diagnosis). I never received any info on tumor markers, this Ki-67 you're all referring to. Is this something that should have been reviewed? Also I mentioned that with my dense breasts, why am I waiting an entire year before another scan/mammo and the NP said the oncologist feels "prior studies showed that a 3D mammogram 1 year after the last study was the best approach – mammograms done 6 months after surgery did not add anything."

I realize that MRI seems to be best for dense breasts but onco said not necessary unless mammo finds something. Any thoughts/comments much appreciated!

Jump to this post


Replies to "Hi everyone - I'm confused as I (57 yrs) recently finished radiation (invasive Lobular -2cm ,..."

Just to reassure you, ki67% is included in the Oncotype test and your results were low at 14.

I was just diagnosed this week with invasive lobular carcinoma. Strongly ER+, PR+ HER2neg. Nothing showed on 2 mammograms or with 2 ultrasounds. I was told to wait 6 months and repeat mammogram. I had a distinct lump and insisted on a referral for biopsy and so here we are. Based on my experience, I would do the MRI (I am having one next week to, I think, determine how far the ILC has spread to help formulate a treatment plan). May I ask how long your radiation was? And again, I would not rely on a mammogram. Take care.