Detecting cancer in women with dense breasts: MRI?
I had my one year mammogram today on my left breast and saw the nurse practitioner at my surgeon’s office. She told me it looked great! I asked about a MRI in six months when I am scheduled for my next appt with her and she agreed. However, when I got home I received the mammo report in their my chart app and it stated that the left breast is heterogenously dense which may prevent them from seeing a mass in some cases. So, this concerns me. Does anyone has any experience with this?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Breast Cancer Support Group.
@semurrey I think you should talk w/ your surgeon and let him know about you getting run around. I personally think that a mammo (on your regular schedule) is not appropriate as it is now not a routine mammogram, it’s a follow up from Cancer. Don’t let the establishment/facility dictate to you. You are Not a complainer, you are being proactive. The front desk ppl are not in the understanding & know. You should have an MRI as follow up. You pay for insurance and unfortunately you need to keep fighting until you get to the right person/doctor. Don’t give up. Sometimes the surgeon figures the oncologist is taking care of things and visa versa. Call your surgeon. Stay strong and God bless.
@rosy54 if your doctor /surgeon prescribes an MRI, the office should check for you. If you have had cancer - IMHO I think MRIs should be done. My cancer was found with MRI after a mammogram showed all was good. It was a surgeon that was proactive to say “let’s do a MRI to see what’s really in there due to your dense tissue “ cancer was found. Check w/ your surgeon to see if he will order up one. Doctors hesitate to order as due to cost but be proactive. It’s frustrating to say the least bit it is Your health. Keep pushing. Blessings
I’m so sorry for your result, please know my heart and prayers are with you for recovery!
I was staged IIB after the pathology from my mastectomy came back. The biopsies missed the invasive cancer, it did show the other ductal in situ/ all in all I wanted to share, the tumors were over 14 CM over 3/4 of my breast but challenging to diagnose as the dense breast tissue is over 73% of my breasts. I went in for an early 3-D mammogram 6 mo after my yearly as my breast just felt thicker. Lucky I did. My continuing follow up includes 3-D mammo with dye contrast.
My Mamm didn’t detect invasive ductal in my dense breasts, but the MRI did
Same for me.
Check this out, just came this morning in the Mayo Clinic newsletter.
What a game changer.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/connected-care/molecular-breast-imagining-finding-what-mammograms-miss/vid-20538287?mc_id=us&utm_source=pes&utm_medium=e&utm_content=engagement&utm_campaign=mayoclinic&geo=national&placementsite=enterprise&invsrc=patloy&cauid=122853
Could this give any of you more confidence in your screenings?
@auntieoakley WOW! That truly is. Game changer. Years ago, during my breast mammo, they told me I had dense tissue. Then over several exams, no mention of dense tissue. I guess I had forgotten about it. It was not until I had an exam by a breast surgeon that he talked about my dense tissue and ordered up a MRI.
In my mind over the years, because it wasn’t mentioned I ‘thought’ it just went away 🤷♀️. I did not know in my younger days.
We all must stay vigilant. Great video & information. Thank you.
I really enjoy the advise to advocate, advocate. I am tired of oncologists referring to the stress of false positives potentially found on MRI. Most of us want the best surveillance available. I have very dense breasts and at 6 months post radiation will meet with my radiation oncologist but no scans for a year. I am going to ask about the molecular breast imaging. I am self employed and have insurance through the MA health exchange. It is $1000 a month with a hefty deductible but why not use the best technology we have to help us on our journey. Why is this such a hassle! xo
I agree! I looked at my doc when he said false positive issues, and asked what’s worse, having a negative biopsy performed or not finding a recurrence in time to stop it. Then of course he said the insurance would never cover it, and he was right. He is a good doc, no, he is a great doc, but the system is pretty overburdened and frankly top heavy.
After it wasn’t found in time to stop it, now we fight for medicine approvals. This is not a bug in the insurance model, it is the main feature. They take your money and they don’t pay. Then they post record profits.
The doctors are furious and the patients are left not understanding.
My best advice is fight for that MRI when it is time for a scan. If you are 6 months post radiation how are you feeling now? Do you have an appointment coming up?
I appreciate your feedback, Chris. I think docs also are held to certain number of prior authorization requests by many powers of "be". I couldn't agree with you more on insurance industry - so terrible that I almost can't wait for Medicare in 8 yrs. Early detection is all we have - I wish I had requested MRI last year when mammo reader did mention at 57yrs she would have expected my breast density to somewhat "lessen". I'm almost 5 months out from radiation for ILC (1.8 cm, ER+) and taking Letrozole. My diagnostic mammo is scheduled for Oct ( regular mammo month) as oncologist at Dana Farber feels mammograms prior to year post surgery not helpful. There seems to be little protocol on timing of scans post treatment. My margins weren't great (less than 1mm) and did 19 radiation treatments with boost. Should I expect a 6 month scan?? Thanks again, xoxo