I reversed osteoporosis without drugs

Posted by sheilad1 @sheilad1, Dec 28, 2022

I had my bone quality test yesterday along with another bone density test. This was my third bone density test in 14 months.

My first bone density test was Nov 2021.
I started consulting with different doctors. If I must take meds I would. But I had to get to the truth.
The physician who appeared to know the most is Keith McCormick DC the chiropractor who got osteoporosis at a very young age and really understands it.

That first DEXA scan showed I had mild osteoperosis of the spine, within the margin of error.
So no McCormick said to take the CTX (blood) test and a few others.
CTX was good.
My CTX shows that the osteoclasts are not breaking down too much bone. therefore, my next bone density test shouldn’t show that that I am much worse.

I decided not to wait until 2 years for another scan and took
I took another bone density (aka DEXA) scan 10/2022 to see if that was true about the CTX.
My spine was actually better in that scan and it was now osteopenia.
My hip was a little worse bringing it outside the margin of error. McCormick said this was a tough call so I said to him why don’t I get a bone quality test (that he told me about) and I figured that will buy me a little time anyway lol.

Unfortunately, the bone quality test only measures the spine.
Since it’s unusual for your spine to get better and your hip to get worse, it made me think - what have I done differently since the last test? Why would my spine improve but not my hip? What is my spine doing that my hip is not?

I decided it had to be the Supernatural virtual reality exercise app that I exercise to (on the oculus quest VR helmet). Even though I am striking the air, there actually is resistance, and I push hard to hit it as powerfully as I can.

I decided to put weights on my ankles. Everything I read says weight training should be once or twice a week, and I certainly only did it once.

Back to yesterday and the bone quality (TBS) test and yet another bone density (DEXA) test.
My hip was back to where it was on the first test. This put me back inside the margin of error where I would not have to take medication
This demonstrated to me that the CTX score did in fact mean I'm not losing density quickly.
Yesterday's test shows that my spine continued to improve and my bone density score was no longerosteopenia. It was normal. My bone quality test was great. The tech really loved it and called me over to show me how I was completely in the green meaning It was normal which is a little unusual at my age, 74, altogether.

I may be wrong about supernatural helping.
I’ll probably take the DEXA again in six months because I am anxious to see how the hip does, and if it improves even more.
And if so, I’ll turn myself into a study. 😂

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Osteoporosis & Bone Health Support Group.

Hi Shielad1,
I'm trying to learn about all the variables here, but there are so many! I'm at least a bit more familiar with what you posted than I was when I first read it. I'm a couple of years older than you and also got a DEXA that said my spine had improved to a -1.6 T-score while my hips had gotten a bit worse than the DEXA 2 years ago showed. Hips are still better than spine (-1.0, -1.2). Here's something confusing. The spine improving more than the hips seems to be a bad sign. In 2019 my spine was -2.9 and now it's -1.6, and yet my 10-year risk of fracture was almost identical (just under 10%). I found an article that said the risk of fracture is calculated not just by T-scores but by the difference between the spine and hip scores--if the spine score was higher, the risk of fracture goes up. Maybe the fact that the spinal T-score improved and the hip scores decreased had the same implications. The doctor (someone I've never met) who assessed the DEXA said the spine was "possibly degenerative," which may have been indicated by the higher spinal T-score compared to the lowered hip scores. At any rate, it seems stupid to continue to take weekly Fosamax when my spinal fracture risk has held steady from when I first took it (2019) and gotten slightly worse in the hips. I have gathered at this point that bone drugs including Fosamax can accelerate bone deterioration by inhibiting bone turnover, which can result in a gain in T-score (bone density) but more fragile bones. I'm leaning towards going back to all-natural ways to battle bone loss--diet and exercise. And I think also not losing too much weight, which could mean bone loss. I do have a GP, who got the report, but he's just a one-note "Take Fosamax for exactly five years," and says it's working because of the higher spinal T-score. Well, maybe it is, but maybe it's destroying my bones. My neighbor took Fosamax "for years and years," at last went off it, and then got bone cancer and died. Maybe unrelated, maybe not. I think the CTX is a good idea but am unaware of ever having that test. Just watched a You-Tube video on how useful a CTX is in assessing bone turnover. If Fosomax is making the bone reabsorb too slowly, the CTX should show that. When bone is reabsorbed too slowly, you keep too much of the old bone and your body stops producing new bone, which can cause bone degeneration and increase risk of a spinal fracture even if your T-score goes up. Were you on any bone drugs before you got the DEXA that said your spine got better but your hips got worse?

REPLY

@0278 I am not clear on why you are taking meds with DEXA scores that high. I am not a doc but wouldn't it make sense to wait? We can only be on bisphosphonates for a limited amount of time and it would seem you are using up those years when not needed as much.

Did you go from -2.9 to -1.6 using Fosamax or were you on another med? Do you have a fracture? Are you on a cancer med that lowers bone density?

REPLY
@windyshores

@0278 I am not clear on why you are taking meds with DEXA scores that high. I am not a doc but wouldn't it make sense to wait? We can only be on bisphosphonates for a limited amount of time and it would seem you are using up those years when not needed as much.

Did you go from -2.9 to -1.6 using Fosamax or were you on another med? Do you have a fracture? Are you on a cancer med that lowers bone density?

Jump to this post

I've taken only one drug. I have not had a fracture. I took once weekly generic Fosomax from June, 2019, thru January 25, 2023, which is the end date only because I’m quitting the med despite doctor's advice to continue. My doctor in 2019 firmly recommended I start the meds due to the lumbar -2.9 T score—osteoporosis range begins at -2.5, so my spine was well into the osteoporosis range. I switched doctors and now have another doctor who flat-out believes that taking Fosomax for 5 years repairs bones, though he did remark rather offhandedly (though alarmingly) that when people stop taking Fosomax, their bones take a rapid and ongoing turn for the worse. I've got the numbers in front of me now, so can say with certainty that between 2019 and 2023 my lumbar spine scores went from -2.9 (osteoporosis) to -1.6 (osteopenia). Meanwhile, left and right femoral neck readings went from -1.6 (2019) to -1.2 and from -1.5 to -1.0 (a decline from a midpoint exam in 2021 at which it had climbed to -0.6). My current general health doctor concluded that this was great news and directed me to continue the Fosamax. BUT conclusions drawn by the 3 unknown doctors who made the reports suggest otherwise, and the comparative changes and proportions between sequential lumbar and femoral readings do, too, as explained in my previous post. The most recent report diagnosed the lumbar spine as “possibly degenerative” (a condition potentially worsened by both aging and Fosamax use). Plus, though a major purpose of taking Fosamax is to decrease risk of bone fracture, over the nearly 4 years I took it, according to the DXA reports, my risk of major osteoporatic fracture went from 9.5% to 9.4% and risk of hip fracture from 1.8% to 1.9%. Since this is virtually no improvement, it does not seem to me worth the increasing degenerative risk of Fosamax (the longer you take it and the older you get, the more you risk compromising skeletal strength and resilience). Anyway, I’ve quit the med despite doctor's advice. If I crumble into a pile of dust, I’ll try to let you know so you can steer a better course.

REPLY
@0278

I've taken only one drug. I have not had a fracture. I took once weekly generic Fosomax from June, 2019, thru January 25, 2023, which is the end date only because I’m quitting the med despite doctor's advice to continue. My doctor in 2019 firmly recommended I start the meds due to the lumbar -2.9 T score—osteoporosis range begins at -2.5, so my spine was well into the osteoporosis range. I switched doctors and now have another doctor who flat-out believes that taking Fosomax for 5 years repairs bones, though he did remark rather offhandedly (though alarmingly) that when people stop taking Fosomax, their bones take a rapid and ongoing turn for the worse. I've got the numbers in front of me now, so can say with certainty that between 2019 and 2023 my lumbar spine scores went from -2.9 (osteoporosis) to -1.6 (osteopenia). Meanwhile, left and right femoral neck readings went from -1.6 (2019) to -1.2 and from -1.5 to -1.0 (a decline from a midpoint exam in 2021 at which it had climbed to -0.6). My current general health doctor concluded that this was great news and directed me to continue the Fosamax. BUT conclusions drawn by the 3 unknown doctors who made the reports suggest otherwise, and the comparative changes and proportions between sequential lumbar and femoral readings do, too, as explained in my previous post. The most recent report diagnosed the lumbar spine as “possibly degenerative” (a condition potentially worsened by both aging and Fosamax use). Plus, though a major purpose of taking Fosamax is to decrease risk of bone fracture, over the nearly 4 years I took it, according to the DXA reports, my risk of major osteoporatic fracture went from 9.5% to 9.4% and risk of hip fracture from 1.8% to 1.9%. Since this is virtually no improvement, it does not seem to me worth the increasing degenerative risk of Fosamax (the longer you take it and the older you get, the more you risk compromising skeletal strength and resilience). Anyway, I’ve quit the med despite doctor's advice. If I crumble into a pile of dust, I’ll try to let you know so you can steer a better course.

Jump to this post

Thank you for your post. That is very interesting.

REPLY
@0278

I've taken only one drug. I have not had a fracture. I took once weekly generic Fosomax from June, 2019, thru January 25, 2023, which is the end date only because I’m quitting the med despite doctor's advice to continue. My doctor in 2019 firmly recommended I start the meds due to the lumbar -2.9 T score—osteoporosis range begins at -2.5, so my spine was well into the osteoporosis range. I switched doctors and now have another doctor who flat-out believes that taking Fosomax for 5 years repairs bones, though he did remark rather offhandedly (though alarmingly) that when people stop taking Fosomax, their bones take a rapid and ongoing turn for the worse. I've got the numbers in front of me now, so can say with certainty that between 2019 and 2023 my lumbar spine scores went from -2.9 (osteoporosis) to -1.6 (osteopenia). Meanwhile, left and right femoral neck readings went from -1.6 (2019) to -1.2 and from -1.5 to -1.0 (a decline from a midpoint exam in 2021 at which it had climbed to -0.6). My current general health doctor concluded that this was great news and directed me to continue the Fosamax. BUT conclusions drawn by the 3 unknown doctors who made the reports suggest otherwise, and the comparative changes and proportions between sequential lumbar and femoral readings do, too, as explained in my previous post. The most recent report diagnosed the lumbar spine as “possibly degenerative” (a condition potentially worsened by both aging and Fosamax use). Plus, though a major purpose of taking Fosamax is to decrease risk of bone fracture, over the nearly 4 years I took it, according to the DXA reports, my risk of major osteoporatic fracture went from 9.5% to 9.4% and risk of hip fracture from 1.8% to 1.9%. Since this is virtually no improvement, it does not seem to me worth the increasing degenerative risk of Fosamax (the longer you take it and the older you get, the more you risk compromising skeletal strength and resilience). Anyway, I’ve quit the med despite doctor's advice. If I crumble into a pile of dust, I’ll try to let you know so you can steer a better course.

Jump to this post

I appreciate your detailed information.

REPLY
@sheilad1

I am 74. Menopause at 50. Scores attached. I did upper body strength training. Lower body walking. Added ankle weights after 2nd scan and see how the hip improved in 2 months. NOTE I had. TBS score which tests bone quality. Doctors are starting to see that that is more important than bone density. For example, our bone density increases after we’re born and we are at 90% by the time we are 15 years old. Young children have low bone density. But they don’t break a bone when they fall as a rule. Because their bones are soft the quality is good. What we need to watch out for our brittle bones. So if you have poor bone density, but good quality, then talk to a Doctor Who understands that because you may not have a high fracture right. Bone density alone is not the best measure of your chances of a fracture. You also need a CTX blood test. That will show if you are losing density quickly and if you’re not, you’re in good shape also, depending on your other tests. It is not easy to find someone who does the TBS Score. It is just a software that is added to the DEXA scan but it’s just not in a lot of offices. Mostly just in hospitals and even then not a lot of them. This is a link to help you find one. I don’t believe it’s complete, but I don’t know how else to find someone who has the software.
http://www.medimapsgroup.com/

Jump to this post

My bone density results improved from 10 years ago according to a recent DEXA scan to my surprise. I didn't do a lot except take a supplement that I put a friend on to help heal his broken neck and which his neurosurgeon and orthopedic physician approved. I started taking the stuff because it was just sitting on the kitchen counter. It includes what I think of as the bone-support trinity of algae-based house, vitamin D3 and K2 plus trace minerals including boron.

Otherwise my bad eating habits and everything were still in effect, including drinking a lot of coffee which I now know is bad for the bones so has been curtailed. [I have a sneaking suspicion that I might have lost a lot of bone density earlier in life because of some lifestyle factors like erratic diet, etc.]

I'm done a lot of research and reading the studies about bones and bone health over the past year. I'm taking this stuff seriously because I hope to never ever take any of the currently available osteoporosis drugs. One thing that I found encouraging was that exercise, especially resistance training, results in the bones and muscles engaging in a feedback loop. That is subjecting bones to appropriate and safe stress, over time, can trigger or speed up bone cell reproduction. And some of the information that the bone needs is communicated by the muscles being used.

It's almost as if the body is asking if this is the new normal, this level of activity, and if so decides to prepare for it. For some reason I thought that was profoundly encouraging and just further reconfirms my appreciation for the mysteries of the human body. But it's also a really good argument for thoughtful resistance training beyond the obvious benefits.

REPLY
@callalloo

My bone density results improved from 10 years ago according to a recent DEXA scan to my surprise. I didn't do a lot except take a supplement that I put a friend on to help heal his broken neck and which his neurosurgeon and orthopedic physician approved. I started taking the stuff because it was just sitting on the kitchen counter. It includes what I think of as the bone-support trinity of algae-based house, vitamin D3 and K2 plus trace minerals including boron.

Otherwise my bad eating habits and everything were still in effect, including drinking a lot of coffee which I now know is bad for the bones so has been curtailed. [I have a sneaking suspicion that I might have lost a lot of bone density earlier in life because of some lifestyle factors like erratic diet, etc.]

I'm done a lot of research and reading the studies about bones and bone health over the past year. I'm taking this stuff seriously because I hope to never ever take any of the currently available osteoporosis drugs. One thing that I found encouraging was that exercise, especially resistance training, results in the bones and muscles engaging in a feedback loop. That is subjecting bones to appropriate and safe stress, over time, can trigger or speed up bone cell reproduction. And some of the information that the bone needs is communicated by the muscles being used.

It's almost as if the body is asking if this is the new normal, this level of activity, and if so decides to prepare for it. For some reason I thought that was profoundly encouraging and just further reconfirms my appreciation for the mysteries of the human body. But it's also a really good argument for thoughtful resistance training beyond the obvious benefits.

Jump to this post

Thanks so much for your experience. I hope to go the supplement route. Include vitamin K and stay away from the drugs!

REPLY
@callalloo

My bone density results improved from 10 years ago according to a recent DEXA scan to my surprise. I didn't do a lot except take a supplement that I put a friend on to help heal his broken neck and which his neurosurgeon and orthopedic physician approved. I started taking the stuff because it was just sitting on the kitchen counter. It includes what I think of as the bone-support trinity of algae-based house, vitamin D3 and K2 plus trace minerals including boron.

Otherwise my bad eating habits and everything were still in effect, including drinking a lot of coffee which I now know is bad for the bones so has been curtailed. [I have a sneaking suspicion that I might have lost a lot of bone density earlier in life because of some lifestyle factors like erratic diet, etc.]

I'm done a lot of research and reading the studies about bones and bone health over the past year. I'm taking this stuff seriously because I hope to never ever take any of the currently available osteoporosis drugs. One thing that I found encouraging was that exercise, especially resistance training, results in the bones and muscles engaging in a feedback loop. That is subjecting bones to appropriate and safe stress, over time, can trigger or speed up bone cell reproduction. And some of the information that the bone needs is communicated by the muscles being used.

It's almost as if the body is asking if this is the new normal, this level of activity, and if so decides to prepare for it. For some reason I thought that was profoundly encouraging and just further reconfirms my appreciation for the mysteries of the human body. But it's also a really good argument for thoughtful resistance training beyond the obvious benefits.

Jump to this post

And, oh yes! The walking and weight-bearing exercise.

REPLY
@ibis3

Thanks so much for your experience. I hope to go the supplement route. Include vitamin K and stay away from the drugs!

Jump to this post

@ibis3 I believe some posters have osteopenia, and some have osteoporosis of varying severity, so the course of action will vary. If your scores indicate high risk of fracture, I encourage you to consider medications. I know from personal experience that fractures are permanently disabling and painful. There might be a med that you can easily tolerate.

REPLY

if you are undecided, then I urge you to take a bone quality test. TBS. It can change your diagnosis.
Some are listed here. There aren't many and you may have to travel to get one. http://www.medimapsgroup.com

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.