← Return to Diagnosed with Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST)
DiscussionDiagnosed with Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST)
Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases | Last Active: Oct 16 11:56am | Replies (91)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "This is my story and I hope it helps someone. 49 and Male diagnosed November 2022..."
So this is quite a parable to be told. An ER doc says ' everyone with age' has idiopathic intracranial hypertension? Bunk. The incidence (number of new cases estimated per year) in the US is about 1 per 100,000. I have zero clue why the ER doc would be so dismissive (well, I DO have some possible thoughts given current medical trends, but that's an entirely different side rant).
One thing I didn't notice in your comment was whether or not an initial CT had been ordered. This under a careful eye might have revealed the initial partial thrombosis, and then an MRV (MRI venogram) would be a solid next step to confirm the initial radiologic interpretation and help evaluate how extensive the thrombosis is. The fact that the neurologist didn't pick up on this underlines a particular problem noted in the medical literature on CVST, namely training in how to reliably diagnose CVSTs in patients (technically any neurologist should be able to get this right. And many do. But it's usually the rather sparse vascular neurologic subspecialists who tend to hit this particular nail).
Conditions like this require multiple sets of eyes in many cases (especially the more complicated they get). And those sets of eyes absolutely need to have transparent and open discussions with each other on a patient's behalf. If that's not happening, find a cadre of caregivers who will.