← Return to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Discussion
pee wee avatar

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Aortic Aneurysms | Last Active: Aug 6 10:50am | Replies (98)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for pee wee @peewee

Thank you for replying to my AAA question. My AAA was discovered in 2007 at a 3.7. Since then I have been having it checked yearly. Everything was the same until last year when it measured 4.0cm. I forgot to mention that I had it checked with a CT scan the first four years than he switched me to ultra sound because he said I was getting to much radiation from the CT 's. When it came up a 4.0 last year I was very upset but he said not to worry that he didn 't think it had changed because the CT test is so much more accurate than the ultra sound . I had my last test (ultra sound) last month and it came back 4.4 cm. I really freaked out. He was still not concerned and said he still dosen 't think it has changed from the 3.7 that it was in 2007. I am having a CT in 6 months for peace of mind. This was at my insistance. He wan 't to wait a year. What do you think ? Have you been having yours checked with CT's or ultra sound? My blood pressure is great , but my cholesterol and triglycerides are a little high. I take medicine.

Jump to this post


Replies to "Thank you for replying to my AAA question. My AAA was discovered in 2007 at a..."

@peewee, I think at least some of the difference in your CT scan and your ultrasound aneurysm is due to the way the measurement is done. I believe CT measures directly across the aneurysm and the ultrasound measures on a bias so will always measure a little bit bigger even when the aneurysm hasn't changed in size. Also, different technicians may measure differently to a slight degree. I think you could ask your cardio about this.

Are you still working? If so, do you have any restrictions? Mine is 4.1cm, haven’t seen specialist yet. Just worried about being able to safely do my job that is physically demanding.