← Return to Treating Osteoporosis: What works for you?

Discussion

Treating Osteoporosis: What works for you?

Osteoporosis & Bone Health | Last Active: Sep 2 10:11am | Replies (1085)

Comment receiving replies
@sue225

On the other hand I have read comments on this blog from people who have fractured with osteopenia not osteoporosis. In my own case, I chose to do nothing until about 5 years after my osteoporosis diagnosis. 67 and no fractures yet (well there was an ankle long long time ago..tripped going down stairs).
All that FRAXL algorithm stuff unfamiliar to me.
I do worry about falling. I need hip surgery in a very arthritic hip. Falling not an option;)

Jump to this post


Replies to "On the other hand I have read comments on this blog from people who have fractured..."

Some studies I read note a significant percentage of serious fractures in women with osteopenia. But the study speculated that they were younger and more active women in general since the percentage of compression fractures was higher among women with osteoporosis. So the latter group likely was more risk-averse in general. I mean one can fracture a bone at any age if damaged in sports activity or other common cause. But I think there few absolutes with any of this stuff.

One study I read, and I wish I'd saved it, questioned whether bone density should be such a singular, significant risk when it tells little about overall bone health. The doctors who wrote it noted cases of very strong and resilient bone of, nonetheless, lower density. The suggestion was that some bodies develop stronger though less dense bone. As if bone, in cases of patients with low density, developed a kind of lightweight carbon steel bone as a result. I wouldn't count on it but the human body is still an enigma so who knows what science will know in 50 years?