← Return to Atrial Fibrillation and long-term management with medication

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@realitytest

Suddenly realizing that "if aspirin won't help with clots", there's no really good reason to force patients to take aspirin forever after the Watchman!

I guess they're just erring on the side of caution in both cases: IN CASE they might help with clots (which do occasionally form after the Watchman) have them take aspirin - even though, they had the procedure to get off anticoagulants!

Likewise, don't encourage clot-vulnerable patients to count on aspirin for significant protection when it only helps REDUCE the risk.

They don't want to be stuck guaranteeing anything, least of all, as a matter of policy (for which they might be held liable).

Jump to this post


Replies to "Suddenly realizing that "if aspirin won't help with clots", there's no really good reason to force..."

Interesting about the shots being given only with active bleeding versus prophylactially. Good issue to research and get a lot of MD opinions!

I wonder if 2-4 weeks of anticoagulant after the Watchman would do the trick reliably-?

You are impressive in your self-advocacy!