← Return to Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): R-CHOP-14 or 21

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@fwpoole

My Oncologist claims there are no clinical trials that 3 cycles is enough for stage 2. But there are trials for 3 cycles with radiation of tumor/nodes. My tumor was removed along with about a foot of intestine. Isn’t removal better than radiation?
@ckeys @ginpene05

Jump to this post


Replies to "My Oncologist claims there are no clinical trials that 3 cycles is enough for stage 2...."

@fwpoole Removal is not necessarily relevant, especially in stage 2. Lymphoma is a circulatory cancer and because of that it can spread, which is why treatment almost always involves chemo. Removal of a node is usually just for biopsy, although there is some research on removal being treatment in very early stage, or less aggressive forms. Removal cal also contribute to spread as you open up possibility of cells leaking. Radiation can help when the tumors are localized, but less so when they are multiple or all over. Being stage 2 sounds like your cancer was already circulating in the area, so radiation can provide some additional benefit even if you had everything removed. I’m sure your doctor can explain why he’s recommended a specific plan.

FYI, I had my initial lymphoma in one node and the base of my tongue (stage 2e). The node was removed for biopsy and I was given chemo plus radiation. My cancer returned in same area. I hope you have success with what your doc recommends!