Pathology interpretation help!
hi. I just received my Pathology results from my Fusion biopsy. Any help interpreting the results, suggestions, advice going forward would be much appreciated.
Final Pathologic Diagnosis
View trends
A. Prostate, RLB, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 1 core(s) (2.8 mm greatest contiguous focus, 30% of tissue)
B. Prostate, RMB, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 1 core(s) (0.6 mm greatest contiguous focus, 5% of tissue)
C. Prostate, RLM, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 1 core(s) (4.2 mm greatest contiguous focus, 45% of tissue)
D. Prostate, RMM, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 1 core(s) (0.5 mm greatest contiguous focus, 5% of tissue)
E. Prostate, RLA, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 (Grade group 2, 10% pattern 4)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 1 core(s) (4 mm greatest contiguous focus, 40% of tissue)
F. Prostate, RMA, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 1 core(s) (0.7 mm greatest contiguous focus, 5% of tissue)
G. Prostate, LLB, biopsy:
- Benign prostate tissue
H. Prostate, LMB, biopsy:
- Benign prostate tissue
I. Prostate, LLM, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 1 core(s) (2.8 mm greatest contiguous focus, 20% of tissue)
J. Prostate, LMM, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 1 core(s) (2.5 mm greatest contiguous focus, 20% of tissue)
K. Prostate, LMA, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 1 core(s) (2.5 mm greatest contiguous focus, 20% of tissue)
L. Prostate, LLA, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 (Grade group 2, 10% pattern 4)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 1 core(s) (3 mm greatest contiguous focus, 45% of tissue)
M. Prostate, ROI 1, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 2 of 2 core(s) (3.5 mm greatest contiguous focus, 40% of tissue)
N. Prostate, ROI 2, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 (Grade group 2, 10% pattern 4)
- Carcinoma involves 2 of 2 core(s) (7.5 mm greatest contiguous focus, 60% of tissue)
O. Prostate, ROI 3, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 1 of 2 core(s) (2 mm greatest contiguous focus, 10% of tissue)
P. Prostate, ROI 4, biopsy:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1)
- Carcinoma involves 2 of 2 core(s) (7.8 mm greatest contiguous focus, 85% of tissue)
Best block for ancillary testing: Block N1
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

@ezupcic
Obviously it is a little late to think about changing surgeons mid stream with a well respected surgeon at a well respected medical institution, but it never hurts to ask. He might be on the cusp of doing it and maybe with you asking, your the one.
@wheel1 I think I have a very well respected surgeon at Oregon Health Sciences University. He did my biopsy and I’m meeting with him soon. But I haven’t committed to surgery yet so will meet the RO as well, get the decipher and see where I’m at.
@topf from what I understand. 17/20 cores positive, 14 3+3 and 3 3+4 10% volume. So yeah a lot of cancer but predominantly 3+3. Of course it’s the 3+4 that matters.
@johnnyz
Most patients stop just in the recovery period.
My husband had RP and he can eat and drink whatever he wants.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@wheel1 Hello, can you tell me more about the “ink” pathology in real time? Are you saying that when the surgeon goes in, they seek to know the margin they should take depending on how close the cancer is to the ink? How is the ink test/check done during the operation? I am thinking that they carefully push aside the nerves, remove the prostate and pathology is immediate on the prostate removed to determine the proximity to the ink? Does this seem an accurate assumption on the process? I am hoping that my surgeon goes in, finds out that the cancer is far enough from the ink that he can perform a negative margin or at least minimal positive margin. Thoughts?
@ezupcic you are correct in your understanding of either way treatment goes, when you are intermediate favourable, both surgery or SBRT appear to be successful treatments. One has to decide how they can manage QOL post treatment and the actual degree of symptoms which are different in varying degrees across other individual. Basically we try to narrow the decision after considering all the factors…best of luck for gaining clarity from your upcoming consultations with the RO and RP surgeon
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@johnnyz
It is officially called Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) analysis. When I refer to real time pathology, you are still under anesthesia while the surgeon is waiting maybe 20 minutes to have what he cut evaluated by pathology for prostate positive or negative surgical margins through the pathology inking of the specimen. Most surgeons do not do this, they cut a pre defined margin already in their review of your MRI, PET, where lesions located, no evidence it has left capsule,etc and close you up. Unfortunately many patients will hear for the first time afterwards at the post surgery appointment they had positive margins left. Certainly sometimes this will be unavoidable due to spread, but many patients have already been advised that their appears no evidence that the cancer has breeched the capsule and the surgeon does standard margin cuts. In my case , my surgeon was surprised as he believed I had no cancer out of the capsule , did his standard cuts, and even from his observation having done over a thousand surgeries saw nothing in the surrounding tissue that appeared out of the ordinary. When it came back positive margin, he had to go in delicately to get more and my surgery extended over two and 1/2 hours entirely messing up his surgical schedule that day with his afternoon. I don’t know how much if any extra money he gets for that, but I think most surgeons want to open and close and not hang around for that or substantially additional surgery time. I was notified at my post surgery that I had negative margin.
This clearly is only done at major hospitals that still have their pathology departments in house. I know many times tissue is now sent to off site pathology that review for alot of others also.
This is becoming more common as the Retzius Sparing has also.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
4 Reactions@wheel1 This is the way they did all cancer surgeries for decades; frozen section sent ‘upstairs’ while the patient was still on the table.
I believe this procedure fell into disfavor with the maturation of chemo and radiation co- therapies: Go in, get out as much as you can… poison and fry.
I have a friend who 40 yrs ago was literally hung upside down in the OR, her intestines unraveled on the table and her body cavity hosed out with sterile saline.
She had an aggressive AdenoCa of the colon and has been alive and healthy with no recurrence. Best,
Phil
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@wheel1 Thanks for this outline of the procedure. Fingers that my surgeon gets the right amount of margin out as needed
@ezupcic It’s hard to say what plan your surgeon would have. Are you having surgery? Your surgeon may tell you that you may need additional adjunct treatment down the road such as radiation. You may or may not need ADT. Once surgery is done, they monitor your PSA to ensure it is 0 or close to that and remains there. Evidence of a PSA number means there is some cancer elsewhere outside the prostate; like your bones or lymph nodes etc. A PSMA PET scan should catch migrating cells if there are any…