Gleason7(3+4) - treatment options recommendation

Posted by manojsmishra @manojsmishra, Aug 25, 2024

Got recently diagnosed with Gleason group 2, 7(3+4). Was in state of shock to know about the cancer.
I’m 56 year old and fortunately I’m with Mayo care since last decade.
Recommendation for me is to have prostatectomy as radiation therapy has long term implications. Took outside opinion also and same recommendation. But not sure how to deal post procedure with urge to urinate situation currently there.
Biggest thing is I’m hoping there is no recurrence occurring after this. Any suggestion/recommendation?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for robertmizek @robertmizek

You wrote “ Radiation has replaced surgery for most people these days. You should look into the other option.” And then suggested that he contact Dr. Mark Sholz in California.

You’ve totally dismissed Mayo Clinic as a center of excellence. Do you honestly think that the doctors specializing in treatment of prostate cancer probably at Mayo are second rate compared to other providers? Mayo sets the highest standard of care.

Stop spreading misinformation that more patients are receiving radiation as their primary treatment. Misinformation is offensive to those of us who are fighting aggressive disease and have gone through surgery after receiving that recommendation from a tumor board at a Center of Excellence.

If you want to share that you received radiation as primary treatment and that your PSA indicates cure please do so to help other men. Don’t give medical advice.

Prostate cancer is a complex disease and treatment is not a one size fits all solution. You’re not a medical expert and need to stop recommending treatment on this forum.

Jump to this post

@robertmizek just got my results

14 cores.
1 Gleason 7 4+3 70%
2 Gleason 7 3+4 10%
3 Gleason 7 3+4 10%
11 others negative

REPLY
Profile picture for dekestet @dekestet

@davidz26
I agree that you should consider SBRT which I finished 3 months ago after a 3+4=7 Gleason. Prior to my decision, I did a decipher and ArteraAI test which were very helpful and reassuring that I was making the best choice. So far so good; minimal side effects in all areas. My initial urologist strongly recommended surgery, prompting me to find a more objective provider. Given my status, the research on surgery did not feel like a necessary or good choice. Good luck on your journey; you’re not alone.

Jump to this post

@dekestet Appreciate your reply and glad things seem to be working out for you.
I feel like focusing on surgery is primarily based on frustration but will look into this Sbrt more.
Do they use Proton or any type of spacer with you?

REPLY
Profile picture for charliebrowntri7 @charliebrowntri7

@robertmizek just got my results

14 cores.
1 Gleason 7 4+3 70%
2 Gleason 7 3+4 10%
3 Gleason 7 3+4 10%
11 others negative

Jump to this post

@charliebrowntri7
You definitely need to look into treatment. The 4+3 with 70% is something that needs to be
treated?.

Are the 3+4 and 4+3 close together? If they are, it’s possible you could have focal therapy.

Five sessions of SBRT radiation would probably work quite well.

How large is your Prostate? How old are you? How high was your PSA?

All factors in the decision you make.

REPLY
Profile picture for ireland1964 @ireland1964

@dekestet Appreciate your reply and glad things seem to be working out for you.
I feel like focusing on surgery is primarily based on frustration but will look into this Sbrt more.
Do they use Proton or any type of spacer with you?

Jump to this post

@ireland1964
You definitely want the rectal spacer gel (SpaceOar) for protection and fiduciary makers for targeting the lesion. They were done at the same appointment. The radiation was standard for the field. Also,make sure your urologist is certified and experienced with the spacer gel which isn’t a given. Best of luck.

REPLY
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@charliebrowntri7
You definitely need to look into treatment. The 4+3 with 70% is something that needs to be
treated?.

Are the 3+4 and 4+3 close together? If they are, it’s possible you could have focal therapy.

Five sessions of SBRT radiation would probably work quite well.

How large is your Prostate? How old are you? How high was your PSA?

All factors in the decision you make.

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc thank you. I’m 65. Prostate is 40. PSA 5.4. All scored as grade 2.

REPLY
Profile picture for Setters and Birds @jonathanack

I was 64 when treated (diagnosed at 62 and then developed additional tumors): 6 tumors - 2 are gleason 7 with cribribform (3+4) and 4 are gleason 6. Bi-lateral. I had a decipher score of .72. I would advise a decipher score very strongly before opting for Active Surveillance.
I had 3 consultations with referrals from my urologist/oncologist Hartford Health Tallwood's - Joseph Wagner - pioneering robotic surgeon 4k successful. Dr. Wagner set up consultations with Smilo Yale/ MSK/ and Tufts). I met with urology surgeons and radiologists from all and each advised exactly the same thing: surgery vs. SBRT were equal in treatment and cure for my situation (contained - with cribriform). There are good backup options beyond salvage prostatectomy if something fails.
I opted for SBRT with Dr. David Byun (MSK/Weil/HHC referred by Dr. Wagner). The radiation was nothing - 5 sessions - and ADT/orgovyx was entirely tolerable (30 days pre-treatment and 90 days post treatment. Not fun - but tolerable. Fatigue was the primary side effect along with some temporary urgency to pee. 9 months after treatment everything is all but 100% normal and functional. No meaningful side effects. Exercise, as advised by many people on this blog - Jeff Marci, Heavy Phil to name two that helped me a lot, was/is very helpful for me. Jeff and Phil among others are very knowledgeable and helpful re: articles, research, and conference(s) updates. I also spent considerable time on this blog, True North, Dr. Scholz (you tube), and my primary care doctor. The deciding factor for me was the risk of being incontinent via surgery and intimacy restrictions and that both viable options were curative. The radiation and ADT had almost no meaningful side effects either during treatment and my function now is as it has always been.
Good luck with your decision - it's a tough hand to be dealt to anyone with cancer, but we (older with treatable issues) are so much luckier than the kids, young parents, etc. that have a much tougher road. It will work out.

Jump to this post

@jonathanack Thank you for your history and overall response. It does sound similar to mine minus the treatment which has not happened. Good to also hear your take on the short dosing of ADT pre/post - my oncologist did say he did not feel that i needed ADT, which supports a lessor concern I suspect.

REPLY
Profile picture for dekestet @dekestet

@ireland1964
You definitely want the rectal spacer gel (SpaceOar) for protection and fiduciary makers for targeting the lesion. They were done at the same appointment. The radiation was standard for the field. Also,make sure your urologist is certified and experienced with the spacer gel which isn’t a given. Best of luck.

Jump to this post

@dekestet I am not sure why, but here in Ontario Canada, they don’t use rectal spacers?

REPLY
Profile picture for johnnyz @johnnyz

@dekestet I am not sure why, but here in Ontario Canada, they don’t use rectal spacers?

Jump to this post

@johnnyz
Costs more money

REPLY
Profile picture for johnnyz @johnnyz

@dekestet I am not sure why, but here in Ontario Canada, they don’t use rectal spacers?

Jump to this post

@johnnyz Why? Canada's evaluation of cost vs. effective. These are not cheap ($5K+) and IF (big if) all the radiation is delivered on target they do not have much impact on any lasting rectal effects. More important for Proton where a miss of the Bragg peak will deliver a large dose to the rectum. Is Proton even used for prostate cancer in Canada?

REPLY
Profile picture for charliebrowntri7 @charliebrowntri7

@jeffmarc thank you. I’m 65. Prostate is 40. PSA 5.4. All scored as grade 2.

Jump to this post

@charliebrowntri7
I forgot to ask you if any of these are found.

Were any of these things found in the biopsy intraductal, ductal, large cribriform, Seminal vesicle invasion, EPE or ECE. (Extraprostatic extensions extra capsular extensions). They can make the cancer much more aggressive.

If none of these were noticed, then you have a lot of treatment options. The cancer does grow slowly, so you do have time to look for the best doctor to treat it.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.