← Return to Drugs vs Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
DiscussionDrugs vs Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Heart Rhythm Conditions | Last Active: 1 day ago | Replies (58)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "I'm 84 years old and have had a-fib for 12 years. Initially medication (diltiazem) was key..."
@bforester1
I have a similar history to you, although I do not have a Watchman, as I am taking Xarelto without problems (so far, anyway!). Tomorrow you will have your AV Node Ablation. I had one last year. As gloaming indicated, you will have to have a Pacemaker. You stated that you understand that communication between the atrium and ventricles is severed (I generally use the term that they "burned the bridge"). Consequently, the pacemaker is needed to keep the heart beating at a 'normal' rate. I resisted for a long time (I told my EP that he wanted me to turn off all the electricity in the house and rely on the generator!). I watched several videos about AV Node Ablation. Here is one that you might find helpful: https://www.youtube.com/watch
Now - a year after the AV Node Ablation, I am grateful that I had it. Unfortunately, my atria are back in AFIB (and my cardiologist says that they will be for the rest of my life). However, it is not an issue for me. My heart beats fine; do be aware that you probably will have to have your pacemaker "tweaked" a few times, so that it works for YOU the way it should. I wish you all the best! Please report back after your procedure.
Connect

@bforester1 I feel for you. I'm not in your boat (maybe 'yet'), but I would say your progression is not atypical, not by any means. I know people reading don't like to see me post this, but the stark fact is that most ablations have a limited lifetime. Remember, it's a progressive disorder once you have it. Maybe slow, maybe dead slow....but it progresses. So, while an ablation might last 8-10 years, I'd say you did very nicely. That first EP did a great job of buying you time out of AF, which would be the one condition that would hasten heart structural changes like enlargement and valve deterioration.
Your elevated HR is worrisome in that it imposes an unnatural burden on your heart that 'should' relax into a typical 50-58 BPM when asleep. Most adults who are otherwise healthy and active, even if advanced in age. Nuking your AV node prevents the irritable circuit that wants your ventricles to beat quite a bit more frequently than they need to....or should need to. If your ejection fraction (LVEF, in the left ventricle) is decent, then the high rate is a problem because it should be unnecessary. You're not climbing a long flight of stairs, so an HR running above 100 BPM is a distinct problem.
I'm guessing that you have a pacemaker ahead of you if they are going to destroy your AV node. Something now has to pace your two ventricles, and the AV node won't be able to do that any more.