Next step after increased PSA, 9 mos after prostate cancer diagnosis

Posted by dhi @dhi, 2 days ago

Nov 2025, I was diagnosed with prostate cancer after elevated PSA, then MRI & finally biopsy. Gleason score 6. Recommended treatment was monitoring, including PSA check every 3 mos. PSA has been 4.3 (Feb). 4.6 (May), 7.9 (Aug)

I contacted my Urologist with the increase from 4.6 to 7.9. I was told they do not see that much of a PSA increase caused by cancer.

I did additional research which at least somewhat supports that conclusion. I requested a new PSA test & a possible prostate MRI. Dr wants to wait 30 days to retest PSA & has not responded to my MRI request.

I am nervous. Looking for thoughts & additional information.

Input much appreciated.

Dennis

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

You definitely have had a significant increase in PSA Since May. Waiting one more month is not too much, That will give you a real good idea of the doubling rate.

Do you know how large your prostate is? That is a factor in PSA size. Have you had any BPH issues, problems peeing, That can raise your PSA.

Were you riding a bike just before getting your PSA test? That can raise your PSA. Don’t do that for a couple of days before getting your PSA test.

If it rises, even a point in the month, that is too much, since it would be close to doubling in four months. That would definitely call for a new MRI. That is what doctors look for a doubling rate that is too fast. After waiting another month, if your PSA continues to rise at a good rate, you could go somewhere else and get a second opinion on treatment.

REPLY

Thank you for your response.

I do have an enlarged prostate & have for 15-20 yrs. Fortunately, other than a minor issue from time to time, I've not had most of the regular problems that many seem to experience with this condition.

I do exercise regularly & it is possible I could have ridden a bike the day prior to the PSA test. I know I did not ride the day of the test.

I guess my primary concern is that I've read that if the PSA jumps as much as mine has in less than 90 days, it could signal a very aggressive new tumor. Perhaps a low possibility, but any possibility is too high in my current mind. It makes me quite nervous & a month seems like a long time.

Thank you again for responding. Your input is valued.

REPLY
Profile picture for dhi @dhi

Thank you for your response.

I do have an enlarged prostate & have for 15-20 yrs. Fortunately, other than a minor issue from time to time, I've not had most of the regular problems that many seem to experience with this condition.

I do exercise regularly & it is possible I could have ridden a bike the day prior to the PSA test. I know I did not ride the day of the test.

I guess my primary concern is that I've read that if the PSA jumps as much as mine has in less than 90 days, it could signal a very aggressive new tumor. Perhaps a low possibility, but any possibility is too high in my current mind. It makes me quite nervous & a month seems like a long time.

Thank you again for responding. Your input is valued.

Jump to this post

@dhi Most jumps in this range are from infection or other inflammation of the prostate. Still need to get it checked in a month. Sex or bike riding can increase PSA but usually not by that much. Recommendation is to refrain for 48 hours before test. A course of antibiotics may allow a retest in 2 weeks. Prostate cancer is a disease with a lot of waits for results in it.

REPLY
Profile picture for jim18 @jim18

@dhi Most jumps in this range are from infection or other inflammation of the prostate. Still need to get it checked in a month. Sex or bike riding can increase PSA but usually not by that much. Recommendation is to refrain for 48 hours before test. A course of antibiotics may allow a retest in 2 weeks. Prostate cancer is a disease with a lot of waits for results in it.

Jump to this post

@jim18
I appreciate you taking time to respond, as well as for the information.

REPLY

Do you know your other numbers which may provide more insight into your recent PSA increase, and the possibility of something more serious lurking unseen:
> PSA Density
> test for UTI or prostatitis
> biomarker (genomic) test results
> genetic (germline) test results

If you can rule out other possibilities, then you can focus on possibility of cancer.

REPLY
Profile picture for brianjarvis @brianjarvis

Do you know your other numbers which may provide more insight into your recent PSA increase, and the possibility of something more serious lurking unseen:
> PSA Density
> test for UTI or prostatitis
> biomarker (genomic) test results
> genetic (germline) test results

If you can rule out other possibilities, then you can focus on possibility of cancer.

Jump to this post

@brianjarvis .

Any of this information is from when I had the MRI & biopsy last Nov. At that time my PSA was 3.51, now 7.87. The biopsy showed mild chronic prostatitis in two samples.
I am not aware or familiar with biomarker or genetic test results. I do have cancer, Gleason 6, in one sample as of last Nov.

Thank you

REPLY

Others have mentioned sex and biking. I’ll offer prostatitis. I’ve been struggling with erratic PSA for a couple of years—I’m Gleason 6 AS for 5 years. It’s troubling but I’ve seen increased from 5 to 7.5 a couple of times. Doxycycline for 2 weeks, wait two weeks and back to 5–more or less my baseline. I’m planning a follow up biopsy—it’s been 4 years since last one. Urologist thinks it’s not the cancer but we’re going to do the biopsy to know more.

REPLY
Profile picture for dhi @dhi

@brianjarvis .

Any of this information is from when I had the MRI & biopsy last Nov. At that time my PSA was 3.51, now 7.87. The biopsy showed mild chronic prostatitis in two samples.
I am not aware or familiar with biomarker or genetic test results. I do have cancer, Gleason 6, in one sample as of last Nov.

Thank you

Jump to this post

@dhi The reason those other tests are important - especially for a Gleason 6(3+3) - is that there’s some debate in the medical community as to whether a true Gleason 6 should even be called “cancer.”

Some in the medical community say that a “3” cell structure can’t metastasize and therefore shouldn’t be considered as a G7+. (That a 6(3+3) is a harmless benign tumor - that it shouldn’t necessarily be treated.)

Others in the medical community disagree. So, the debate continues.

This is a presentation by Dr. Scholz referencing a study involving 26,000 cases that concluded that a “true” Gleason 6(3+3), never metastasizes: https://youtu.be/NV8QHzbgamI

So, other tests may be needed - in conjunction with regular PSA monitoring - to insure that it’s a “true” G6 and that there’s nothing more serious lurking unseen that isn’t being picked up by MRI and biopsy.

REPLY
Profile picture for brianjarvis @brianjarvis

@dhi The reason those other tests are important - especially for a Gleason 6(3+3) - is that there’s some debate in the medical community as to whether a true Gleason 6 should even be called “cancer.”

Some in the medical community say that a “3” cell structure can’t metastasize and therefore shouldn’t be considered as a G7+. (That a 6(3+3) is a harmless benign tumor - that it shouldn’t necessarily be treated.)

Others in the medical community disagree. So, the debate continues.

This is a presentation by Dr. Scholz referencing a study involving 26,000 cases that concluded that a “true” Gleason 6(3+3), never metastasizes: https://youtu.be/NV8QHzbgamI

So, other tests may be needed - in conjunction with regular PSA monitoring - to insure that it’s a “true” G6 and that there’s nothing more serious lurking unseen that isn’t being picked up by MRI and biopsy.

Jump to this post

@brianjarvis
Thank you for your time & information. Much appreciated.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.