Should I have the Spinal Cord Stimulator? Looking for reviews on this
I have had chronic lower back pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis for over 10-years. I have had multiple therapies and procedures done - including RFA, Epidural steroid injections, a MILD procedure, acupuncture, OT/PT and Chiropractics, as well as an Interspinous spacer and nothing has helped my pain. After all of that, the physician I saw in March's only recommendation was for me to have the Spinal cord stimulator, but I am actually afraid of this and have read that there have been numerous injuries as a result of this implant, and after reviewing the booklet and watching the video I initially felt that it was just to restrictive in terms of how you could move your body. If you have had this procedure please let me know your results. Many thanks.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Spine Health Support Group.
Connect

I have an SCS. Boston Scientific. Mine helped a lot until I herniated L5. After my laminectomy (Jan. 26) everything was good but now I'm in lots of pain and it's not helping. You CAN get your settings changed to higher stimulation if need be but I haven't done that yet.
I will say that the recovery after the surgery to get it implanted was THE most painful surgery I've ever had and I've had many.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@dkpffdp Very interesting! You are a walking billboard for spinal cod stimulators. My rechargeable Medtronic SCS worked great for about 2 1/2 years until it suddenly just stopped. I was hoping to get a trial of a different SCS, but the doc could not get the leads in the "sweet spot' due to scar tissue. Haven't you experienced any of that with all the hacking and cutting done to your back? My surgery was done in Bethlehem, PA
My friend, I have been fortunate with scar tissue, I do have a lot of scar tissue in my L4 and L5 nerve root sleeves and due to repeat surgeries and fusion surgery in the 1990's (they used to just about crack you open) my low back is full of scar, when my physician placed the leads for the DRG under fluoroscopic guidance, he indicated it was just nothing but scar but he had no issues placing them appropriately. Strange that an SCS would leave a large amount of fibrosis (large amounts of hardened scar tissue) in your thoracic spine. Did you by chance have paddle leads installed? Percutaneous leads leave very little scar tissue in fact one of the major issues I have is that the leads move around far too much with positional changes. The new Medtronic system uses a closed loop system where in they sense a change in position and adjust stimulation accordingly. They also use multiple wavelengths to prevent the issue that many SCS patients have ... the body gets used to the signals and lose efficacy, typically starting around the 6 year mark. Depending on sources, up to 40% of SCS systems are removed by the 10 year mark due to this complication or lead migration. I highly recommend that all patients have both the trials and the installations done in a surgical center under strict fluoroscopic guidance. I am only 52 (I was seriously injured when I was 20) and having so many surgeries at a younger age, I am sure, helped prevent some of the complications that I now have with the surgeries in my 50's. I would highly encourage you to seek another opinion and then after that get another, as much as Philadelphia is a pain, I have been told by multiple surgeons that the A students are in Philadelphia, New York City etc. I went all the way to New York city for a tertiary opinion before having an additional decompression & fusion done at L3-4 due to adjacent segment disease. Was the severe scar tissue indicated in an MRI or CT Myelogram? As much as many of do not like to face it, the surgeon's skill is paramount as is the approach. Boston Scientific also has a top notch open system SCS that alternates wavelengths. Was the 2nd stimulator approach attempted with percutaneous leads? Given their small footprint they rarely leave large amounts of scarring and you may be able to get a better result with lead placement. Get another opinion brother there are doctors that specialize in almost nothing but stimulator implants.
I have never heard of any of the SCS working long term despite the companies claims. My wife got about 2 years on hers before she got no benefits anymore.
When they do the trials tey jack the thing up as high as they can go to be able get results in the 7 days, but it is not a sustainable level long term.
I have always believed that your body gets used to it and finds ways to couneract it. Pain is a bodies natural reaction so its just trying to do its job.
Just my common man's opinion.
The biggest winner in these things are all the Mfgs, reps & Dr.'s at 50K a pop.
@dkpffdp Quiet a story! My Medtronic unit had a paddle leaf. After it died, they told me that a number of electrodes had burned out. Just my luck!
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions@heisenberg34 Yes, apologies I did not mean to get long winded, I just want to be able to help some with my story, but I am very happy now to have conversed with you. I do my diligence, I worked in Pharma for 20 years, but your particular issue was not something I had direct knowledge of. Your words have prompted me to research that a bit. I was happy to be able to recover some from the original injury and move on to a great career even if what cut a bit short. Thank you for response.
@jlssurplus The trials although painful always seem to work way better than the final implant. I too believe that regardless the therapy, Spinal nerve ablation, SCS, injections, pain meds all have a way of losing efficacy. During the time when my condition was in remission, I was a gym rat for 10 years .... it got me farther than any other therapy combined although at a certain point that is no longer a viable option like so many others.