← Return to Surgery or Radiation if large cribriform found in biopsy?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@overage
I’m sorry about that. I thought that particular video specifically mentioned radiation was not successful with cribriform.

Unfortunately, I could not find the information. I attend so many of these presentations and I thought that was the one where it was mentioned. It must’ve been another one, but I can’t find it right now.

Here’s some more information which appears that what I’ve heard was dated or doctors differ on their opinions. It’s interesting that this particular forum is mentioned as one of the sites discussing it.

Cribriform morphology (in prostate cancer) is highly aggressive, with a higher risk of metastasis. While some past discussions suggested surgery was better due to early concerns about radiation missing this pattern, recent clinical analyses show radiation combined with hormone therapy is highly effective, significantly reducing the risk of metastasis

.The debate regarding whether surgery or radiation is best for cribriform prostate cancer involves several nuances:

Traditional Perspective: Historically, because cribriform cells are highly aggressive, experts debated whether radiation could completely eliminate them. In many of these cases, surgeons and oncologists favored radical prostatectomy for physical removal.

Modern Radiation Evidence: Recent studies on the management of cribriform-positive cancer indicate that modern radiotherapy—especially when combined with neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)—is highly impactful, reducing the long-term risk of metastasis by 65%.

Mixed Patient Opinions: On forums like Mayo Clinic Connect and Reddit, opinions on surgery vs. radiation differ, as some patients with cribriform morphology are advised to use combination radiation and ADT while others are guided toward surgical removal.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@overage I’m sorry about that. I thought that particular video specifically mentioned radiation was not successful..."

@jeffmarc And probably a brachy boost to that area would be even more effective. Thanks!
Phil

@jeffmarc I have just been recently diagnosed. As I said in my other comments, the jury is out on my risk - when I met with Dr. Sprenkle of Yale he said I was intermediate, favorable risk. I think the cribriform structures upgrade my 3 tiny 3+3's from low risk to intermediate. If it were so, that radical prostatectomy ends up being the best way to deal with it, I'm f'd. 74 years old. An except from our meeting "I reviewed the MRI and measured his membranous urethra length to be 1 cm, which is associated with a slower likelihood of recovering urinary control. " He said I could be wearing diapers a year from surgery. For now, all my Dr.'s are recommending no treatment until something changes. I've had my biopsy read by 2 respected pathologists (Yale being the more experienced in PC). I've reached out to Jonathan Epstein to get a feel whether he could be more determinate. The clarity would be well worth the $500. Thank you for sharing your "journey" (I hate that word!)