← Return to Study: 2/3rd of All Fractures Are Not Attributable to Osteoporosis

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for daisy17 @daisy17

@njx58 Some of the analysis in the report are a bit confusing and make me want to do more research into the study and the results.

However, in the discussion it summarizes: "In this long-term study, we demonstrated that only 16% of total fractures in women and 15% of total fractures in men were attributable to low BMD (defined as BMD T-score ≤−2.5). When low BMD was combined with advancing age, the two factors accounted for approximately one-third of all fractures. In other words, advancing age and osteoporosis did not capture 65% of all fracture cases."

it has recently been shown that a majority of fractures actually occur in those without osteoporotic BMD. In this study we confirmed that observation. Indeed, almost 73% of women and 94% of men who had sustained a fracture did not have osteoporotic BMD at baseline."

Jump to this post


Replies to "@njx58 Some of the analysis in the report are a bit confusing and make me want..."

@daisy17 wow!!

@daisy17 I read this a bunch of times also. I think they are saying a lot of fractures were osteopenia but between -2.0 and -2.5. They mentioned the risk is more continuous and not just if you are -1.9 that is way better than -2.5. And people under -2.5 are not being treated. But the broader issue I think you or someone mentioned is the treatment of this group could or should be focused on balance, strength, nutrition, etc. They didn't mention all that as it was not the purpose of the analysis. Only if we don't look at this group we will not see a large decrease in fractures.