← Return to 3% Saline vs. 7% for Nebulizing

Discussion
zscline avatar

3% Saline vs. 7% for Nebulizing

MAC & Bronchiectasis | Last Active: May 18 12:48pm | Replies (123)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for kathyjjb @kathyjjb

@cwal A few studies that have shown up to 25% negative test result after nebulizing 7% , 2/day with ACT. It did not show to be so effective when cavities were present, I don't believe any of the study participants with cavities ever achieved a negative without antibiotics. Participants included those with MAC, Abscessus, etc. and the results didn't discriminate. I know a 7% saline nebulizing study at Univ of Oregon has or is winding down-nothing published with 50 or 100 participants-so more info should be released within the next year. I believe that study included people on antibiotics. It would be nice to see a large-scale study of at least 100 nebulizing prior to antibiotics. I was diagnosed with M.Abscessus in 11/24 (and symptomatic). I am so thankful for my pulm doctor for telling me I needed to start nebulizing immediately. He had the compressor and supplies on STAT and I got them within a few days. Last year, I had 3 negatives and in the fall positives but low counts (32, 22, 8). So, it's still there but no change in my CT's and counts are very low.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@cwal A few studies that have shown up to 25% negative test result after nebulizing 7%..."

@kathyjjb
That is great you've had that much success. Have you had to take the Big 3 as well?

@kathyjjb it was reported at the NTMir conference last week that the Oregon study did not reach enrollment and closed early. I believe they are still going to report their results for those enrolled, but we were told the study is not large enough to be statistically significant.