← Return to Considering Tulsa Pro or Proton radiation (full gland)
DiscussionConsidering Tulsa Pro or Proton radiation (full gland)
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 18 hours ago | Replies (101)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "So I had my consultation st University of Cincinnati and they stated no real difference between..."
Connect

@jaygk
1. Sounds good
2. The 28th sessions are IMRT The five sessions are SBRT. I’ve actually heard from many people that have had both and there doesn’t seem to be much difference in side effects between the two. If you were having 38 sessions of IMRT, maybe the side effects would be less than five sessions of SBRT. It’s hard to really say for sure. I’ve heard of similar results.
3. If you must get ADT, tell them you want Orgovyx. It has a lot fewer side effects and Your testosterone can come back quicker. Base the amount of ADT on what the results of your tests show. If you are a Gleason five longer ADT is necessary. Same with a high decipher score. Recent tasks have shown longer treatment results in longer life If you have aggressive cancer.
The second 2. Should you have surgery? You don’t mention how old you are. The younger you are the longer it might allow you to survive. Wait for the results of your 2nd biopsy evaluation and decipher. If they both come in high, you need to be careful, If you are young and in your 60s or less, you may have a longer remission with surgery. If all the tests come in low, then radiation makes more sense.