← Return to Considering Tulsa Pro or Proton radiation (full gland)
DiscussionConsidering Tulsa Pro or Proton radiation (full gland)
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: May 19 4:15pm | Replies (101)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "@brianjarvis I think brianjarvis is saying exactly the right thing, that is why I wanted proton...."
@bjroc
In the monthly meeting Mayo held, the radiation oncologist. Discussed the fact that they have four proton machines at Rochester and are putting in two more. Proton machine used to require a whole building be built now they can be put in a room or two. Of course Mayo Rochester is constantly Expanding so they’re probably building new buildings anyway.
The radiation doctor said that he’s only used proton four times so far. He talked to his patients about the options for both and in the vast majority of cases they went with photon.
It would be interesting to hear that conversation.
Since it has become so much cheaper to build a proton machine environment the cost is Going down a lot, so there probably will be a much closer price difference between proton and photon. This is something that was predicted about a year ago at one of the conferences, by a radiation oncologist. It could be in the future. The only machines available would be proton machines..
@bjroc
You could try Dr Struve at University of Cincinnati. I know it is not close but….
Connect

@bjroc Have you consulted with the University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute? All they do is proton so if they say you're not an appropriate candidate I'm sure they'll give you a good reason. I consulted with them and was very impressed, but went with a highly recommend hospital with proton much closer to my home. If I lived closer to Jacksonville or I didn't have a proton center closer they would have been my choice.