Connect
← Return to Pulse field ablation
Discussion
Heart Rhythm Conditions | Last Active: 38 seconds ago | Replies (85)
Comment receiving replies
@gloaming
Reduced dwell time equals a shorter procedure, which is never a bad thing regardless of the outcome. Of course, new medical technologies are usually viewed as superior from the manufacturer's perspective ($$$) and who knows to what extent they have their thumb on the medical community scales?
Replies to "@gloaming Reduced dwell time equals a shorter procedure, which is never a bad thing regardless of..."
Connect
@nevets It may mean a shorter procedure, which may mean less anesthetic, but there's that problem of increased exposure to fluoroscopy. Seems there no magic bullet in the world of catheter ablations. I am optimistic we'll get 'there', hopefully before I need a third ablation. So far, so good....