← Return to Flutter Ablation Versus Conservative Treatment First

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for labexperiment @labexperiment

If you have typcal atrial flutter ablation has shown 97% success. Even after though you can get fib. The diiference is typical flutter is organized whereas fib is unorganized. Both represent aberran electrical pathways and remain untill their roads are blocked and with ablation the road block is a scar. However electricity is like water and takes the path of least resistance so the ectopic foci are looking for a way around the scar.

The good news wqith typical flutter is it involves the cavotricuspid isthmus usually and only involves the right side of the heart so there is no septal puncture and you go home the same day. You should feel better getting it fixed. Cardioversion is usually a failure and the drugs aren't very healthy or effective

Jump to this post


Replies to "If you have typcal atrial flutter ablation has shown 97% success. Even after though you can..."

@labexperiment Agree with your perspective on this. AFL tends to want to stay in AFL, whereas the earliest stages of AF, they being 'paroxysmal (comes and goes, but mostly absent) and 'persistent' (begins to assert itself more often, and goes on more than a week at a time), mean you are in normal sinus rhythm much/most of the time. Flutter is often more asymptomatic for the patient than AF is; both can be complete surprises to their hosts when a physician tells them they are in AFL or AF. I know a very active retired professor who found out about his own AFL in a doctor's office. They rushed him through the lineup for an ablation, which he got in ten days instead of ten weeks because they weren't sure how long he'd been in flutter, and it can really put a load on the heart. He had to have two ablations if I recall correctly, but he has been in NSR for over five years now.