Hormone therapy before radiation treatment question....
Hello teammates...
I was diagnosed with prostate cancer at age 65. PSA results were elevated at 12.5....Had the MRI's and biopsy done as well...
PiRads of 5....Biopsy shows Gleason scores of 7 (4+3) and Stage 2 unfavorable...
After much research and meetings with radiation oncologists and surgeons, i decided to go with radiation. I am lucky that living in the NYC metro area I am able to work with NYU Langone. I will be getting treatments with the MRI Linac machine.
The Dr recommends 6-8 weeks of daily ADT treatments (pill) prior to radiation...
My question is this....what should I be doing to prep for the hormone treatments from a diet point of view...I do walk 3-5 miles a day (weather permitting) and train with kettle bells.
I am concerned about muscle loss, heart and bone issues, and some of the other potential side effects. I know we are all different in what we can tolerate, but I want to make sure I am prepared as best as I can before I enter the ring and deal with the ADT and radiation treatments.
Thank you for any comments and assistance in this matter.....
PS: Sorry if I didn't include any other pertinent info....I am a rookie to this forum...Thanks for understanding
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

@jeffmarc you are correct. Won’t argue with that. Otherwise I get the privilege of tossing and turning all night between bathroom trips. Good advise.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@jeffmarc
Thank you so much for the information and links....I am so glad I found this group.....Everyone has been very helpful, and I am learning by everyone's responses, and comments throughout this board....
I received an update from NYU today as well....They sent my biopsy slides to a company in Florida (Artera) which does an AI assessment of the biopsy slide...My prognostic risk score was "low"...And the document mentioned "no clear risk reduction with the addition of short-term androgen deprivation therapy to RT"...
The great staff at NYU believes with my advance PC, I should still follow through with the short term ADT. It's because the pathologist noticed cribriform when they reviewed the slides....I am waiting for the Decipher results which won't be ready for 4-5 days....
The nurse practitioner did mention to me that the ADT treatments will be for 4-6 months, and not 4-6 weeks.....I guess I misunderstood when I met with the RO at NYU....either way I am preparing myself mentally and physically for the journey ahead....
I really appreciate all the guidance and support from ya all.....
You all are in my prayers!
Thank you!!
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@heavyphil
Thank you so much.....
You are correct regarding the ADT treatments continuing for 6-8 weeks after radiation....I received a call today from NYU stating that ADT treatments are 4-6 months....not 4-6 weeks like I thought.....
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@stew80 I wrote: "Exercise reduced the risk of cancer recurrence or death by 28%. ADT vrs no ADT does not improve patient outlook by that much."
I meant ADT does not improve patient outlook compared to no ADT, by as much as the 28% improvement found in the CHALLENGE study I was discussing. I didn't mean to imply that ADT was not a first line treatment.
I was thinking about my specific case, which has been summed up by my radiation oncologist as "cT3b". He also describes me as "at least high risk" although he has no evidence that it has metastasized except to the seminal vesicles. He has a senior position at an NCI designated cancer facility, and when I asked how much of a benefit I can expect if I accept his prescription for 2 years of ADT, he said 20%.
I realize that the benefit of ADT varies according to the stage of cancer that is being treated. However I agree with those who say now that evidence such as the CHALLENGE trial exists, it is time for the doctors and patients to change their attitudes to the benefits of exercise, from the current "it can't hurt", or it seems like a "good idea", to something as valuable in cancer care as things like ADT or chemo, i.e. first line recommended treatment, with recommendations and supervision paid for by insurance.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 ReactionsThanks for clarifying. I was also diagnosed as T3b and my doctor encouraged
me to remain on ADT for 2 years *after* my PSA first became
undetectable. That put me into the summer of 2027. I asked about taking an
ADT holiday (pausing for a few months and then starting again). He said he
didn't like that idea. I thought the benefit might be higher than 20%. I
truly would love to get off the ADT, but ......
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@lg22222 I had both a Decipher and Artera-ai test. In my case, I was true on Artera-ai and 0.81 on Decipher so there was agreement on the need for ADT. I think it is wise that you are getting both tests. Even though you were false on Artera-ai, you might still get a high Decipher score that would justify going on ADT. Let us know what you and your RO believe to be the Decipher score that would tip you towards needing ADT. See my bio for more info.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@cadaddy I saw a study that compared fixed ADT intervals and increased either pre or post ADT treatment. Found no effect from increasing pre-treatment and found post treatment most effective. Radiation was 6-9 weeks of IMRT, so concurrent had more ADT by the end of the treatment. Pre might be more effective with 1 week of SBRT. Many cancer cells take months to die so ADT will weaken them either way.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@stew80 I accepted the idea that I would give staying on ADT for whatever time my RO suggested my best shot regardless of the various bad things I've heard about it.
I.e. I heard a recording of a urologist speaking to an audience of other urologists who said: "ADT wrecks old men's lives. We all know that". I also didn't like the available data that indicates that the longer a patient is on ADT, the less likely it is that their testosterone level will recover to the level it was pre-ADT. And, many patients never recover their testosterone.
However, I came to agree with those who state that ADT drug therapy is about as good of a drug therapy that exists in cancer care, because in so many cases it can set the cancer back significantly for very long periods of time. It also seems to allow radiation to work better. I decided to accept whatever the data showed in the way of ADT length given the particular definitive therapy I eventually chose.
After I decided on radiation as my primary treatment, I looked for if there were radiation treatments that called for less ADT time. There are.
I eventually chose 20 sessions of external beam, plus a high dose brachytherapy boost. The TRIP study examined if there was a difference between groups of men who were all given this same radiation combination therapy. One group were given 6 months of ADT and the other had 30 months.
The study was designed to show the superiority of 30 months of ADT. There was no meaningful difference in any measurable outcome between the two groups of patients.
The TRIP study would not have accepted me as an eligible patient because the cutoff for eligibility was stage T3a, and at T3b my case is too high risk.
However, my RO is now talking about 1 year of ADT rather than 2 years.
Nelson Stone discusses the TRIP study in the video entitled "Radiation Dose and Hormone Therapy: How Much is Enough?". He supervised the criteria for all the centers who administered the radiation treatments for this study to make sure the delivered dose were as uniform as possible no matter what center the patients were treated at. The TRIP discussion is about halfway into the video.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 ReactionsMeta analysis (Nov. 2025) of a lot of EBRT studies showed little benefit past 12 months for high-risk local disease based on all-cause mortality vs. just prostate cancer. For intermediate it was 6 months and without intermediate risk factors it was zero. So, it is not just EBRT with HDR that shows little benefit from increased ADT length with no distant metastasis.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/article-abstract/2841671
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionI started Orgovyx six weeks prior to nine weeks of radiation. PSA was already down 50% when radiation began. Dr. Newton spoke at a http://www.pcri.org conference about preferred exercises to reduce muscle loss, and I have started doing those twice weekly. Here is the link to one of his presentations: https://youtu.be/XXTcYilkPJo I have three months remaining of my eighteen prescribed of ADT.