@pamandgreg Whoops, I don't know what I was thinking. Yes, the official report says you DO have bradycardia. I'm happy you caught that...and are paying attention more than I. (Where's that red-faced coughing emoji?) 😀

Bradycardia is officially any sustained HR measured that has a rate under 60 BPM. Many cardiologists think that number should be revised downward at least five points. This is because of the 'fitness generation' and their penchant for racket sports, running, cycling, etc where their fit hearts routinely are running below 50 BPM, often below 40...!!! And they're perfectly fine, no syncope or shortness of breath. What is not evident in the information you provided is how low, how long. And did you, during the measuring interval, feel any symptoms that could reasonably be attributed to 'bradycardia' when your monitor recorded the lowest heart rates? Does your heart respond readily to increase demand, such as rising to your feet from a seat and maybe climbing stairs to a bedroom? These are important questions that could mean your official 'bradycardia' is really of no consequence. But............if you have a history of stumbling, fainting, wheezing and feeling unwell, swollen ankles, etc...these could be signs of an HR that is simply too slow for your needs. And you have just posted that you do indeed have some minor episodes of shortness of breath. This could be ectopy or valvular function/deterioration problems.

chickenfarmer has lots of experience and learning under his/her belt, so do have a careful read, please.

I am sorry I misread your earlier statement. Sin in haste, repent at leisure.