Replies to @mikeneverwired Unfortunately, as of last summer's formally published findings, PFA does not enjoy a reputation for...

Discussion

Heart Rhythm Conditions | Last Active: Aug 24 9:38am | Replies (54)

Comment receiving replies

@gloaming

@mikeneverwired Unfortunately, as of last summer's formally published findings, PFA does not enjoy a reputation for succeeding to stop ectopy and AF over the other techniques. So far, its sole advantage is that it is safer in some ways (while not as safe in another). For example, there is much less risk of damaging the phrenic nerve or the esophagus compared to RF and cryo ablations. However, PFA requires more flouroscopy, and that means more radiation exposure to the body.

Jump to this post

Replies to "@mikeneverwired Unfortunately, as of last summer's formally published findings, PFA does not enjoy a reputation for..."

mikeneverwired | @mikeneverwired | Jan 28 10:10am

@gloaming I read a few papers on the process before having my procedure and was comfortable having it done on me. ...but as you say, it is important to review as much data as you can prior to getting anything done.

I can state for a fact that the PFA technique I had was effective as it almost completely eliminated my SVT and aFIB episodes. Can you please forward the link the the study you referenced? I'm sure everyone on this thread would benefit from reviewing it.

Thanks!

VIEW AND REPLY