← Return to MRI before biopsy, & then fusion biopsy if targets found (?)

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for jercalif @jercalif

@bens1
My limited research indicates that PSMA PET is definitely a superior in finding cancer that has spread outside of the prostate...is it also superior within the prostate?

Unfortunately, even if a patient in the United States is willing to pay cash for the $10-20K PSMA PET scan, the patient may have to switch urologists to find one that will prescribe the PSMA PET scan.
My urologist only grudgingly agreed to an MRI, and actually became angry when I asked about the possibility of a fusion biopsy.
Yes, I'm switching urologists.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@bens1 My limited research indicates that PSMA PET is definitely a superior in finding cancer that..."

@jercalif
While the PSMA PET scan works well to find metastasis outside the prostate. It is not capable of doing the detailed. imaging within the prostate itself. As a result, an MRI is much superior to a PET scan to look for anatomical details of the prostate.

@jercalif
I was so glad to read your last sentence!