← Return to Is ADT ever used at reduced dosage to moderate side effects?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for carbcounter @carbcounter

@jeffmarc I would presume a lower dosage is possible, shots or pills.

My guess would be that this is not an unreasonable thing to do but that frequent monitoring and dose adjustment would be required and no provider wants to do that much work.

But it could at least be evaluated in studies.

(heck, start with rats, or whatever they use!)

I see ADT has been used for decades or longer, depending on what you count, and in all that time, no studies?

It might fail, but living with milder side-effects might be a winner at least for some, of course it depends on all the metrics I see people talking about and then actual monitoring and adjustment for each specific case.

My questions are colored by my experiences with other drugs for other conditions where the standard dosing has often turned out to be too high for me or the optional higher dosing has increased side-effects but not been any more effective.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@jeffmarc I would presume a lower dosage is possible, shots or pills. My guess would be..."

@carbcounter
The problem is that having a higher testosterone level is probably not going to help. People need to get it below 50 to be really effective in stopping the cancer from growing. You get below 150 and you’re going to get many of the symptoms Of low testosterone, like hot flashes, muscle, deterioration, bone deterioration And fatigue at least for some people. I know people that have stopped taking ADT and nine months to a year later when their PSA hits 150 they’re still getting hot flashes. It’s gotta go higher than that to really get the benefit of stopping ADT.

I don’t really think there is any happy midpoint, something you could discuss with a doctor.

I know the stampede trial says you need it below 50 in order to be beneficial.