@kndaustin71 You are right; I was sloppy there. And thank-you for pointing out my error. But, just because it's lower than the 'guideline' says constitutes a bradycardia doesn't necessarily mean it's dangerous, and that was my point in stating '...so that's good.' It would be different if the person had both bradycardia and atrial fibrillation, for example, which is also technically possible.

Thanks, again.