← Return to Pulse field ablation
DiscussionComment receiving replies
Replies to "The PF ablation success rate is closer to 82%. After suffering with AFib for about five..."
@cstrutt52 wow. That is awesome. I pray I have that result. I have full faith in my doctors skills but if it doesn’t work I will consider Mayo Clinic. It would be a flight for me to Cleveland from NJ. Was there a particular doctor you used?
@cstrutt52 I agree with you--finding the #1 clinic or #1 electrophysiologist to do the procedure is very important! I appreciate your recovery story and I am very hopeful about my ablation because I only experienced A-fib for one year before my ablation. From what I have read, the sooner it is addressed this way, the better. I gave up all alcohol and cut down on caffeine which might have been one of my triggers. Mostly I lost weight and have always exercised daily, so those things may have helped too! But mostly I got a great physician and I am so pleased that he seems to have taken his time and really did more than the "basics" to get a good result for me.
Connect

@cstrutt52 This study suggests otherwise, now three months old:
https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases/Pulsed-field-ablation-was-not-superior-to-radiofrequency-ablation-in-paroxysmal-atrial-fibrillation
I'm always happy to see success cases, no matter who the patient is, the EP performing their ablation, and the technique used. The variances in success (one full year free of the treated arrhythmia) are due almost solely to the skill and experience of the operator of the devices. So, choosing one's EP is a critical part of one's eventual success story when it comes to catheter ablations.