← Return to 2nd opinion on MRCP interpretation or not?

Discussion
lpaelevated4 avatar

2nd opinion on MRCP interpretation or not?

Pancreatic Cancer | Last Active: Oct 17 1:36pm | Replies (8)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for castell @castell

@lpaelevated4
I've reviewed my nine-year-old records. I had an ERCP, not an MRCP. The ERCP is more invasive, and can take X-rays, and allowed the gastroenterologist to insert a stent in my blocked bile duct.

I am in Kaiser in San Diego. I didn't feel they downplayed any test results. I think all doctors, including those at Kaiser, are very conscious of their potential legal liabilities if they overlook threats to your health. I asked for a second opinion at UCSD, but they would not pay for it.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@lpaelevated4 I've reviewed my nine-year-old records. I had an ERCP, not an MRCP. The ERCP is..."

@castell thank you for your time to look up old records . I’m thinking about asking for 2nd opinion for another radiologist to read the image.
I sent another message to GP about referring me to GI going through test results and images . No answer back so doubt it may happen. If they found non mucinous cyst why would I need follow up 2 years later . Just want to be thorough.