← Return to 2nd opinion on MRCP interpretation or not?

Discussion
lpaelevated4 avatar

2nd opinion on MRCP interpretation or not?

Pancreatic Cancer | Last Active: Oct 17 1:36pm | Replies (8)
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for lpaelevated4 @lpaelevated4

@castell Is this with S. CA Kaiser in Los Angeles? Sorry to hear about your pancreatic cancer. Did you feel that kaiser downplay the MRI results?

Jump to this post

Replies to "@castell Is this with S. CA Kaiser in Los Angeles? Sorry to hear about your pancreatic..."
castell | @castell | Oct 17 10:40am

@lpaelevated4
I've reviewed my nine-year-old records. I had an ERCP, not an MRCP. The ERCP is more invasive, and can take X-rays, and allowed the gastroenterologist to insert a stent in my blocked bile duct.

I am in Kaiser in San Diego. I didn't feel they downplayed any test results. I think all doctors, including those at Kaiser, are very conscious of their potential legal liabilities if they overlook threats to your health. I asked for a second opinion at UCSD, but they would not pay for it.

VIEW AND REPLY