← Return to EP evaluation of persistent AFIB

Discussion
treeguy avatar

EP evaluation of persistent AFIB

Heart Rhythm Conditions | Last Active: 8 hours ago | Replies (22)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for gloaming @gloaming

@aard Most EPs who aren't hungry for money would refuse a patient unless they had/have other comorbidities and cardiac defects either corrected or well under control. Since mitral valve prolapse can cause AF, there's little point in attempting an ablation until and unless the mitral valve is repaired. Remember, each intervention requiring invasion of the body is risky. Surgeons are loath to enter a body unless the risk is manageable and small, and unless the benefits greatly outweigh the risks. So, attempting to perform a 'successful' ablation when the cause of the AF is still present seems wasteful of resources, the surgeon's time, and adds to the risk burden for the patient already slipping in health.

These are general rules understood by most everyone, patient and physician. However, each case presents as a unique one and all relevant factors have to be considered. The conscientious physician will only intervene surgically if to not do so presents an even greater hazard.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@aard Most EPs who aren't hungry for money would refuse a patient unless they had/have other..."

@gloaming Maybe you misunderstood. I completely understand why my EP wasn't going to do a procedure other than the ablation, which I needed to control my afib. The mitral valve wasn't enough of an issue to require intervention at that point. The fact that I didn't have any afib after about a month after the procedure (which is expected) points to the correct diagnosis and treatment. The cause at that point wasn't the mitral valve, but the aberrant signals coming from my pulmonary arteries/veins - the cryoablation I had fixed that issue as evidenced by no afib since my mitral valve repair. The correct procedures were done in the correct order, and at the correct time.