← Return to EP evaluation of persistent AFIB

Discussion
treeguy avatar

EP evaluation of persistent AFIB

Heart Rhythm Conditions | Last Active: 2 hours ago | Replies (22)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for gloaming @gloaming

@saganjames I see your point, and for me it would/should be protocol that all EPs discuss the ramifications of leaving the LAA open vs closed, not needing a DOAC if it checks out fully closed at the 6-month TEE mark, reducing the risk of stroke with an occluded LAA vs relying on a DOAC with its risk of serious bleeding, and so on. My hope is that this is done and that some opt not to have it (probably from being surprised with the topic's introduction as they sit there on their first visit not having done some homework about AF and it's associated issues, including the risk of leaving the LAA open). But, as a lifelong learner and educator, I try hard to remember all the pertinent and possible outcomes or potential problems with any action or intervention, and discussing the LAA's risks for AF sufferers would be high on the list. Why not a one 'n done approach while the body is on the slab right before them and open or otherwise catheterized, ready for the job(s)?

Jump to this post


Replies to "@saganjames I see your point, and for me it would/should be protocol that all EPs discuss..."

@gloaming according to my cardiologist, the Watchman Procedure is frequently not covered by insurance/Medicare. I have an appointment with an EP in a couple weeks to discuss ablation & Watchman Procedure, & I am fully prepared to pay out of pocket if he recommends the Watchman Procedure. There are very specific qualifying criteria for insurance to cover the Watchman, and unfortunately not wanting to be on blood thinners is not one of the criteria! So ridiculous.