I just wanted to express my disagreement about a conflict of interest with Gelida.
https://www.academia.edu/69834267/Specific_Bioactive_Collagen_Peptides_in_Osteopenia_and_Osteoporosis_Long_Term_Observation_in_Postmenopausal_Women
At the end of the article published in the prestigious BJM journal authors state: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article
was reported. SO has given scientific lectures that were in
parts supported by the GELITA AG. He is also co-inventor
of patents concerning the use of collagen peptides. All
procedures performed in studies involving human partici-
pants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the
institutional and/or national research committee, and with
the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or
comparable ethical standards. The funders had no role in
the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or inter-
pretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in
the decision to publish the results.
Look, to make a wrong statement can ruin the researcher´s carrier, and it is not worth it.